Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Political science

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Political science

Inferring actual malice from altered quotations

Article Abstract:

The Supreme Court in Masson v New Yorker Magazine Inc dealt with the conflict between freedom of the press and state defamation laws, but failed to provide a clear standard to guide journalistic practice. The court applied a vague 'material alteration' test for determining whether actual malice could be inferred from altered quotations. The court rejected lower court standards based on rational interpretation and incremental harm without providing an adequate alternative. The five-part standard outlined by Judge Kozinski in a dissenting Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals opinion offered a better approach.

Author: Polk, Katherine M.
Publisher: Harvard Society for Law and Public Policy, Inc.
Publication Name: Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy
Subject: Political science
ISSN: 0193-4872
Year: 1992
Libel and slander

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


The ever more complicated "actual innocence" gateway to habeas review

Article Abstract:

The US Supreme Court's 1995 Schlup decision on federal habeas corpus review for innocent state prisoners defines a complicated actual innocence exception instead of providing a clear standard based on factual innocence. The decision's actual innocence gateway is premised on the concepts of legal innocence and reasonable doubt. However, a factual innocence standard would be easier to apply and would aid petitioners who are actually innocent, while simultaneously preventing abuse of the habeas procedure.

Author: Ditkoff, Joseph M.
Publisher: Harvard Society for Law and Public Policy, Inc.
Publication Name: Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy
Subject: Political science
ISSN: 0193-4872
Year: 1995
United States, Habeas corpus

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Comments on JHPPL review symposium

Article Abstract:

The author attempts to answer critiques of his book 'Professionalism: The Third Logic'. He points out that his book concerns professionalism in general while using the example of the medical profession. He did not attempt, as his critics imply, to write specifically about the medical profession.

Author: Freidson, Eliot
Publisher: Duke University Press
Publication Name: Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law
Subject: Political science
ISSN: 0361-6878
Year: 2003
Analysis, Criticism and interpretation, Medical practice, Professions, Hafferty, Fred, Havighurst, Clark C., Relman, Arnold S.

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Cases, Case Note
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Environmental regulation: governments, businesses, and activists. Science and environmental risk: The case of perchlorate contamination in California
  • Abstracts: Distributive justice and international trade. Reconciliation for realists. A different kind of justice: dealing with human rights violations in transitional societies
  • Abstracts: Defending the wall: maintaining church/state separation in America. The state of the world atlas
  • Abstracts: Understanding the low in terms of the high. Understanding riots. More about understanding diabetes
  • Abstracts: A classical approach to real exchange rate determination with an application for the case of Greece. Secular gnosticism and classical realism
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.