Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Political science

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Political science

Presidential sanctuaries after the Clinton sex scandals

Article Abstract:

President Clinton, while contesting both Paula Jones's civil suit and the investigations by Congress and the Office of the Independent Counsel regarding the Monica Lewinsky scandal, raised several claims of presidential sanctuary, including privilege and legal immunity. A review of the principal court decisions rendered on these claims reaffirmed that the president enjoys substantial immunity from judicial process and insulation from impeachment, though this does not mean he is above the law.

Author: Miller, Randall K.
Publisher: Harvard Society for Law and Public Policy, Inc.
Publication Name: Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy
Subject: Political science
ISSN: 0193-4872
Year: 1999
Presidents, Presidents (Government), Executive privilege (Government information), Impeachments, Impeachment, Privileges and immunities

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


The Sixth Circuit navigates the post-Romer wreckage

Article Abstract:

The US Court of Appeals for the 6th Circuit, in Equality Foundation of Greater Cincinnati v. City of Cincinnati, upheld an amendment to Cincinnati's city charter that repealed two municipal ordinances that banned discrimination against homosexuals. The Court affirmed this decision even after the Supreme Court struck down a similar state-wide law that prohibited bans on discrimination against gays in Colorado. The 6th Circuit found Cincinnati's amendment to have a rational basis.

Author: Webber, James K., Jr.
Publisher: Harvard Society for Law and Public Policy, Inc.
Publication Name: Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy
Subject: Political science
ISSN: 0193-4872
Year: 1998
Cases, Discrimination against gays, Case Note

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Mend it or end it? What to do with the independent counsel statute

Article Abstract:

The independent counsel statute will expire in June 1999 unless Congress in some form renews it. Debate is raging as to whether to repeal the law altogether, to renew it in modified form, or to keep it as it is. The best course would be to retain the office but with changes to promote a more effective system of investigation and prosecution.

Author: Cook, Julian A., III
Publisher: Harvard Society for Law and Public Policy, Inc.
Publication Name: Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy
Subject: Political science
ISSN: 0193-4872
Year: 1998

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: United States, Laws, regulations and rules, Special prosecutors
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Trade and human rights: the case of China. The limits of economic forecasting. Money, macroeconomics, and forecasting
  • Abstracts: Six observations on the exclusionary rule. The virtues and vices of the exclusionary rule. Victims and the exclusionary rule
  • Abstracts: Bank failures, systemic risk, and bank regulation. How state regulation of the Internet violates the commerce clause
  • Abstracts: Private interbank discipline. Hope for the tort system: congressional proposals for reform
  • Abstracts: Liberalism, equal status, and human rights. The rebirth of African liberalism. For individual rights
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.