Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Psychology and mental health

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Psychology and mental health

Alive and well after 25 years: a review of groupthink research

Article Abstract:

Janis's groupthink theory, first suggested in 1971, has become the focus of much research and analysis in various disciplines such as political science, psychology, and business. Janis's analysis of decision fiascoes, such as the Vietnam War, Bay of Pigs Invasion, and the defense of Pearl Harbor, has been extended by others to include the Cuban Missile Crisis, Space Shuttle Challenger, and the Iran-Contra affair. Results from the analysis of 10 historical cases showed that group cohesion and time pressure are not necessarily antecedents of groupthink.

Author: Esser, James K.
Publisher: Elsevier B.V.
Publication Name: Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes
Subject: Psychology and mental health
ISSN: 0749-5978
Year: 1998

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Revisiting the Bay of Pigs and Vietnam decisions 25 years later: how well has the groupthink hypothesis stood the test of time?

Article Abstract:

Irving Janis's groupthink hypothesis remains a potent tool for evaluating sources of erroneous group decision making. Janis relied on data from debacles such as the Bay of Pigs invasion and the involvement of the US in the Vietnam War to understand failures in decision making. However, new evidence in the formulation of the decisions, suggests that dysfunctional group dynamics were not a significant factor in the decision making process as Janis argued.

Author: Kramer, Roderick M.
Publisher: Elsevier B.V.
Publication Name: Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes
Subject: Psychology and mental health
ISSN: 0749-5978
Year: 1998
Analysis, Cuba, Vietnamese Conflict, 1961-1975, Bay of Pigs Invasion, 1961

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Group dynamics in top management teams: groupthink, vigilance, and alternative models of organizational failure and success

Article Abstract:

A historical assessment of decisions made by the top management teams of 7 companies listed in the Fortune 500 was performed through the use of the Organizational Group Dynamics Q-sort (GDQ). The relevance of Janis's groupthink model was analyzed through the examination of the successes and failures of the teams. Results showed GDQ to be a useful tool for evaluating organizational behavior theories using historical case studies.

Author: Tetlock, Philip E., Peterson, Randall S., Owens, Pamela D., Fan, Elliot, T., Martorana, Paul
Publisher: Elsevier B.V.
Publication Name: Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes
Subject: Psychology and mental health
ISSN: 0749-5978
Year: 1998
Information Theory, Decision-making, Models, Decision making, Information technology

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Research, Human resource management, Interpersonal relations, Social groups, Decision-making, Group, Group decision making, Policy sciences
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Bulimia nervosa, restrained, and unrestrained eaters: a comparison of non-binge eating behavior. Cross-cultural research on anorexia nervosa: assumptions regarding the role of body weight
  • Abstracts: Prenatal infection and adult schizophrenia: a review and synthesis. Maternal influenza and schizophrenia in the offspring
  • Abstracts: The cognitive development of 5-year-old children of postnatally depressed mothers. Cognitive vulnerability to depression in 5-year-old children of depressed mothers
  • Abstracts: Lesbians, bisexual women, and body image: an investigation of gender roles and social group affiliation. Relationship of weight, body dissatisfaction, and self-esteem in African American and white female dieters
  • Abstracts: Ferenczi's relaxation principle and the issue of therapeutic responsiveness. The feud between Freud and Ferenczi over love
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.