Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Psychology and mental health

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Psychology and mental health

Delay aversion versus impulsivity: testing for dysfunction in ADHD

Article Abstract:

Edmund J.S. Sonuga-Barke's interpretation of dysfunctional performance of children with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder as delay aversion rather than impulsivity suffers from several drawbacks. Sonuga-Barke fails to clearly define the difference between indifferent responding and impulsivity. Sonuga-Barke's interpretation is based on the averaged data. A close look at individual subject data provides evidence for a preference for the immediate reward, rather than a mere indifference. The effect of reward size on children's performance also needs to be considered.

Author: Schweitzer, Julie B.
Publisher: Elsevier Science Publishers
Publication Name: Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines
Subject: Psychology and mental health
ISSN: 0021-9630
Year: 1996
Sonuga-Barke, Edmund J.S.

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


When ''impulsiveness'' is delay aversion; a reply to Schweitzer and Sulzer-Azaroff (1995)

Article Abstract:

The performance of children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in Julie B. Schweitzer and B. Sulzer-Azaroff's intertemporal choice task paradigm can be interpreted as delay aversion rather than impulsivity. Sensitivity to differences in overall delay is termed as delay aversion. There is evidence for indifferent responding, as children show an indifference between the immediate and delayed reward alternatives. Several aspects of Schweitzer and Sulzer-Azaroff's paradigm, and maladaptive impulsiveness are briefly discussed.

Author: Sonuga-Barke, Edmund J.S.
Publisher: Elsevier Science Publishers
Publication Name: Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines
Subject: Psychology and mental health
ISSN: 0021-9630
Year: 1996
Schweitzer, Julie B., Sulzer-Azaroff, B.

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Self-control in boys with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder: effects of added stimulation and time

Article Abstract:

The external validity of choice tasks was supported in a study of 5- and 6-year-old boys with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). The boys with ADHD were less likely to choose delayed-larger rewards than a control group of typical boys, and the difference between the groups increased over time. Choice was not affected by added stimulation. For the ADHD group, increased rates of motoric activity were associated with decreased preference for delayed-larger rewards over time.

Author: Sulzer-Azaroff, Beth, Schweitzer, Julie B.
Publisher: Elsevier Science Publishers
Publication Name: Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines
Subject: Psychology and mental health
ISSN: 0021-9630
Year: 1995
Choice (Psychology), Self-control (Child psychology), Childhood self control

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Research, Analysis, Children, Criticism and interpretation, Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder, Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, Impulse, Impulsivity
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: The confusion over psychotherapy (II): implications for forensic (correctional) practice. The confusion over psychopathy I: historical considerations
  • Abstracts: Psychometric properties of impulsivity measures: temporal stability, validity and factor structure. Anxiety, antisocial behavior, and heart rate regulation in adolescent males
  • Abstracts: Access to global and local properties in visual search for compound stimuli. Right-hemisphere memory superiority: studies of a split-brain patient
  • Abstracts: The Comprehensive System for the Rorschach: a critical examination. Thinking critically about the Comprehensive System for the Rorschach: a reply to Exner
  • Abstracts: Developmental differences in the acquisition and maintenence of an organizational strategy: evidence for the utilization deficiency hypothesis
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.