Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Psychology and mental health

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Psychology and mental health

Effects of judgement on memory: experiments in recognition bias and process dissociation in a professional judgment task

Article Abstract:

Post-judgment memory bias in a professional undertaking in which the judge can be held accountable is examined in an experimental environment commonly experienced in financial service institutions such as auditing firms, investment banking, and law firms. The conditions of the experiment involve the documentation of evidence after judgment is made and the affirmation or objection of the decision by a reviewer. Results indicate that former judgments of dependents affect their capacities to distinguish evidence which may have important implications in how auditors record evidence.

Author: Ricchiute, David N.
Publisher: Elsevier B.V.
Publication Name: Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes
Subject: Psychology and mental health
ISSN: 0749-5978
Year: 1997
Research and Development in the Social Sciences and Humanities, Social & Behavioral Sciences, Memory, Dissociation (Psychology), Dissociative disorders

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Why are judgments less consistent in less predictable task situations?

Article Abstract:

A study was conducted on the reduced consistency of judgments in less predictable task situations. Results showed that subjects attempted to simulate noise and the pattern in the series when making forecasts. Subjects acted in such a manner either because they considered a clear pattern in a sequence of their judgments to be inconsistent with the randomness of data or because they attempted to represent data randomness in each judgment they made.

Author: Harvey, Nigel
Publisher: Elsevier B.V.
Publication Name: Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes
Subject: Psychology and mental health
ISSN: 0749-5978
Year: 1995

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Normative and substantive expertise in multiple hypotheses evaluation

Article Abstract:

Two criteria are presented to study the judgments of trained professionals. The first criterion conforms with a theoretical model. The second conforms with known external criteria. Judgments different from a theoretical model are labeled errors. Judgments are labeled mistakes when they are different from external criteria.

Author: Wright, Arnold, Asare, Stephen K.
Publisher: Elsevier B.V.
Publication Name: Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes
Subject: Psychology and mental health
ISSN: 0749-5978
Year: 1995
Evaluation, Beliefs, opinions and attitudes, Auditors, Hypothesis, Hypothesis (Logic)

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Research, Judgment, Judgment (Psychology)
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Eye movement desensitization and reprocessing in eating disorders: caution against premature acceptance. The theme of death in the French and German literature on eating disorders
  • Abstracts: Repetition blindness interacts with syntactic grouping in rapidly presented sentences. Double dissociation between memory systems underlying explicit and implicit memory in the human brain
  • Abstracts: Relations between language and memory: the case of repetition deafness. Monitoring conscious recollection via the electrical activity of the brain
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.