Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Psychology and mental health

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Psychology and mental health

The rank-order effect in group decision making

Article Abstract:

The rank-order decision procedure may provide a means of improving group decision making processes by stimulating group members to discuss important aspects of each alternative solution. Compared to the 'choose the best' procedure, rank-order procedure opens an opportunity for each member to weigh each alternative against the other in terms of unique and common information contained in each alternative. The procedure is also less authoritarian in its intervention, leading to more openness and increasing the chance of choosing the best solution to a problem.

Author: Hollingshead, Andrea B.
Publisher: Elsevier B.V.
Publication Name: Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes
Subject: Psychology and mental health
ISSN: 0749-5978
Year: 1996
Group Dynamics, Methods, Decision-making, Decision making, Management, Human resource management, Interpersonal relations, Social groups

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Group discussion and first advocacy effects in computer-mediated and face-to-face decision making groups

Article Abstract:

A study was conducted to detect influence by a first group member's advocacy of a position and to assess whether group discussion by computer mail or face-to-face conditions the degree of such influence. First advocacy variables which were tested include assignment of first advocate, discussion before advocacy and mode of communication. Results show that first advocates who listen to early group discussion present decisions close to that of the group's. Computer mail and face-to-face discussion exhibited similar decision making processes.

Author: Weisband, Suzanne P.
Publisher: Elsevier B.V.
Publication Name: Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes
Subject: Psychology and mental health
ISSN: 0749-5978
Year: 1992

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Acceptance of uncommon information into group discussion when that information is or is not demonstrable

Article Abstract:

The acceptance of a fact into a group discussion when the fact's existence is or is not demonstrable is investigated. A three-way interaction between demonstrability, familiarity and number of advocates is observed. Results show that a fact known by only one person dominates discussion when it is easily demonstrated and is a familiar topic. An unfamiliar topic leads to improved acceptance of a nondemonstrable one-person fact and involves more facts compared to discussions of a familiar subject.

Author: Parks, Craig D., Cowlin, Rebecca A.
Publisher: Elsevier B.V.
Publication Name: Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes
Subject: Psychology and mental health
ISSN: 0749-5978
Year: 1996
Information theory

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Research, Decision-making, Group, Group decision making, Discussion
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Mental accounting and decision making: Evidence under reverse conditions where money is spent for time saved. The development of interpersonal strategy: autism, theory-of-mind, cooperation and fairness
  • Abstracts: Meaning making and management action. Social information processing and group-induced shifts in responses to task design
  • Abstracts: Predicting compliance with command hallucinations. Persistence and remission of depressive symptoms in late life
  • Abstracts: Predicting compliance with command hallucinations. Hypnotically induced auditory hallucinations and the mouth-opening maneuver: a failure to duplicate findings
  • Abstracts: More clinical child psychology advances. An information-processing view of children's memory
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.