Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Retail industry

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Retail industry

Long-standing policyholders do not deserve much compensation

Article Abstract:

UK life insurance companies are facing difficult questions about how to compensate their owners, with-profits policyholders, as they abandon mutual status, either to float on the stock market or allow themselves to be purchased by another company. It has been widely assumed that the policyholders who have been with the company the longest would receive the highest compensation. However, Jim Stretton, chief executive of Standard Life, has caused controversy by stating his belief that policyholders who have been with a company only a short time, and have therefore only built up a small fund, should receive the highest compensation.

Author: Rodgers, Peter
Publisher: Financial Times Ltd.
Publication Name: The Independent
Subject: Retail industry
ISSN: 0951-9467
Year: 1996
Investor relations

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


I've got just the policy for you, guv. It's a good little runner

Article Abstract:

It is possible for life insurance companies to achieve high sales on the basis of extensive advertising and a positive reputation, regardless of the actual performance of their products. Prudential, for example, is seeing sales rise constantly, even though it has been rated poorly on the basis of a new rating system devised by John Chapman, a former senior official at the Office of Fair Trading. This situation contrasts strongly with that of most other industries, where companies offering poorly performing products would not be profitable.

Author: Rodgers, Peter
Publisher: Financial Times Ltd.
Publication Name: The Independent
Subject: Retail industry
ISSN: 0951-9467
Year: 1996
Standards

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Big risks and a dubious deal for taxpayers in the nuclear sell-off

Article Abstract:

The UK's nuclear generating and construction industry has suffered severe difficulties over a large part of the last 30 years. Dungeness B power station, for example, suffered ill-fitting components and contractor collapse, while the other six nuclear power stations built at around the same time have also had problems. This poor record is being glossed over in the information which has been published in an effort to attract investors to the 2.6 billion pounds sterling privatisation of British Energy in summer 1996.

Author: Rodgers, Peter
Publisher: Financial Times Ltd.
Publication Name: The Independent
Subject: Retail industry
ISSN: 0951-9467
Year: 1996
Management, Planning, Nuclear industry, Privatization, Privatization (Business), British Energy PLC

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Insurance industry, Life insurance industry, Column
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Wrong turning in a minefield. Fun? I'd rather do maths O-level again. Hey, big spender!
  • Abstracts: Howling across the borderline. As though he had wings. Welcome to the Dreadzone
  • Abstracts: No smut, no smirking. When freedom is no release. To tip or not to tip, what is the answer?
  • Abstracts: How to reduce paper losses. Doubling the shares doesn't double the money. Fixed rates won the race if you started in 1991. But things are different now
  • Abstracts: Strong medicine. Two into one will go
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.