Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Retail industry

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Retail industry

The use of human judgement models in evaluating sales force performance

Article Abstract:

Randomly chosen sales managers were given a hypothetical situation concerning a manager who must evaluate six salespeople. Seven attributes were chosen and the respondents were given the hypothetical manager's analysis. They were then told to evaluate the salespeople themselves. The attributes were: product knowledge, customer relations, sales volume and ability to meet quotas, sales presentation, appearance and expense control. Five models of human judgement were used with the weighted linear compensatory model being the most consistent in predictive ability. Other models used were: simple linear compensatory model, lexicographic model, and disjunctive and conjunctive models. It was found that decisions did vary depending on the type of attribute considered. When considering promotions or transfers, product knowledge and customer relations were ranked as important. Due to certain limitations of this study, future research might study actual evaluations or focus on a better model of human judgement applicable to the situation.

Author: Patton, W.E., King, Ronald H.
Publisher: M.E. Sharpe, Inc.
Publication Name: Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management
Subject: Retail industry
ISSN: 0885-3134
Year: 1985
Psychological aspects, Evaluation, Judgment, Judgment (Psychology)

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


The use of human judgement models in sales force selection decisions

Article Abstract:

The purpose of this study was to examine the choice process by which sales managers select a salesperson from a pool of applicants. Sales managers randomly selected from a commercial mailing list were mailed a questionnaire containing a hypothetical selection scenario profiling several salespersons possessing differing qualifications and characteristics. Respondents were asked to make selection decisions based on the scenario by indicating their judgements of the overall qualifications of the candidates as well as situation-specific selection decisions. Simple and weighted linear compensatory models, in general, exhibit superior predictive ability to the non-compensatory models, but the predictive superiority is significantly less for situation-specific selection decisions than for judgments of overall qualifications. (Reprinted by permission of the publisher.)

Author: Patton, W.E., King, Ronald H.
Publisher: M.E. Sharpe, Inc.
Publication Name: Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management
Subject: Retail industry
ISSN: 0885-3134
Year: 1992
Analysis, Recruiting, Employee selection

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Sales training and impression management

Article Abstract:

Impression management as a tool for sales people is the manipulation of communication techniques to create a desirable impression among prospective buyers. Specific manipulation techniques are examined and explained. The issue is also analyzed from the perspective of the sales manager, with methods for testing sales people's impression management abilities and training techniques for improving these abilities.

Author: King, Ronald H., Booze, Martha B.
Publisher: M.E. Sharpe, Inc.
Publication Name: Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management
Subject: Retail industry
ISSN: 0885-3134
Year: 1986
Methods, Selling, Employee training

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Research, Decision-making, Decision making, Human resource management, Sales management, Sales personnel, Salespeople
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Memoirs of an inadvertent spy. Harmonizing at the moon. Suspended between east and west
  • Abstracts: Congruence in sales force evaluations: relation to sales force perception of conflict and ambiguity. An examination of reward preferences for sales managers
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.