Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Science and technology

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Science and technology

Can design professionals be made responsible for safety?

Article Abstract:

The Occupational Health and Safety Act of 1970 deals with ensuring the safety and health aspects of working conditions. Although the absolute safety is not possible, its capacity of eliminating or greatly reducing significant harm is recognized. Tasked with carrying out the act, the Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission recently decided on a case that arose from the collapse of a certain structure which injured several employees of third parties. The comission refused to extend the language of the act as it maintained that the engineer was not liable for the injuries.

Author: Loulakis, Michael C., Cregger, William L.
Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
Publication Name: Civil Engineering
Subject: Science and technology
ISSN: 0885-7024
Year: 1992
Laws, regulations and rules, Occupational health and safety, Occupational safety and health, Engineering

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Design-build joint venture liability

Article Abstract:

A single party contract for both designing and construction reduces the risks of the owner but may be quite risky for the contractor. For any defect in the design or construction, the design-builder has to bear the cost. In the Sirrine Inc. versus Dravo Corp case the Court of Appeals in Georgia ordered Sirrine Inc. and the designer to pay $5,518,812 as compensation to Dravo. Sirrine argued that the judgment was based on speculation. The court acknowledged that design problems led to various changes in the project resulting in cost overruns.

Author: Loulakis, Michael C., Cregger, William L.
Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
Publication Name: Civil Engineering
Subject: Science and technology
ISSN: 0885-7024
Year: 1996
Georgia. Court of Appeals

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Federal legislation will increase design-build opportunities

Article Abstract:

The Federal Acquisition Reform Act of 1996 (FARA) allows federal agencies to choose design-build for construction project delivery. Design-build, favored by many owners, allows for tighter scheduling and earlier cost estimation. FARA defines when a project is suitable for design-build. However, FARA's administrative regulations have to be finalized for implementation. The design-build construction provisions will require a review of standard federal acquisition regulations clauses.

Author: Loulakis, Michael C., Cregger, William L.
Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
Publication Name: Civil Engineering
Subject: Science and technology
ISSN: 0885-7024
Year: 1996
Engineering design

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Cases, Construction, Contracts, Building
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: EPA moves to make corporations responsible for disposal of mountains of manure. Breaching dams may save salmon, but the science remains an issue
  • Abstracts: A doubling of renewable electricity could brighten the European Union. Promoting a greener European Union
  • Abstracts: A/E or contractor liability? Design-build limitations of liability are successful. Employer liability for job-site injuries
  • Abstracts: Use of sensitivity analysis to compare chemical mechanisms for air-quality modeling. Photochemical modeling of the Southern California Air Quality Study
  • Abstracts: Holographic evaluation of edge delamination in bars bonded to a rigid support with foam-adhesive. Estimation of size and depth of debonds in laminates from holographic interferometry
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.