Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Social sciences

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Social sciences

An appeal by any other name: Congress's empty victory over habeas rights

Article Abstract:

The US Supreme Court's ruling in Felker v. Turpin finding that it can hear death penalty habeas petitions as original matters circumvented the restrictions Congress placed on the Court under the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act. Prior to 1996, the last time Congress used the Exceptions Clause to enacted legislation limiting the Court's jurisdiction was 1867. Congressional action restricting the Court's jurisdiction dangerously undermines the Court's political neutrality, but the Court succeeded in narrowing the law's practical implications.

Author: Moss, Scott
Publisher: Harvard Law School
Publication Name: Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review
Subject: Social sciences
ISSN: 0017-8039
Year: 1997
Judicial review, Jurisdiction, Habeas corpus

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Tying the hands of Congress

Article Abstract:

The US Supreme Court in 1997's City of Boerne v. Flores started a likely trend of not deferring to Congress's decisions to protect its conception of fundamental rights of individuals under the 14th Amendment. The Court refused to allow Congress to bypass the Court's 1990 restrictive decision in Employment Division v. Smith with the Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993. The Court's decision that the Act is an unconstitutional exercise of Congress's Section 5, 14th Amendment power will most affect new categories of persons subject to discrimination.

Author: Toker, Rachel
Publisher: Harvard Law School
Publication Name: Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review
Subject: Social sciences
ISSN: 0017-8039
Year: 1998
Legislative power

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Not in my apartment! When landlords mix business and religion

Article Abstract:

State courts have split in cases where landlords have been sued for refusing to rent apartments to unmarried couples because doing so would violate their religious beliefs. California decided in a landlord's favor, but Alaska ruled against the landlord, stating the landlord's actions violated the state's fair housing law. Some attorneys believe ruling in the landlords' favor twists the meaning of the First Amendment, which was intented to prevent government and others from forcing their religious beliefs on others.

Author: DeMuth, Jerry
Publisher: American Bar Association
Publication Name: Human Rights
Subject: Social sciences
ISSN: 0046-8185
Year: 1995
Religious aspects, Unmarried couples, Housing discrimination

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: United States, Cases, Case Note, Freedom of religion
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: A longitudinal analysis of environmental equity in communities with hazardous waste facilities. Innovations in auto safety design, a key to quality improvement
  • Abstracts: Motivation and the will to power: ethnopsychology and the return of Thomas Hobbes. On going native: Thomas Kuhn and anthropological method
  • Abstracts: Perceptions of organizational safety: implications for the development of safety culture. A new section of the Journal of Organizational Behavior: "The Incubator."
  • Abstracts: Voters' tax-price perceptions and the provision of government non-marketed goods. Optimal money market behavior and sterling interest rates
  • Abstracts: External economics and trade: an empirical analysis. The limits to land reform: the Land Acts in Ireland, 1870-1909
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.