Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Social sciences

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Social sciences

Federal judge overturns state family court ruling

Article Abstract:

US District Judge William A. Barbour of Jackson, MS, reversed the decisions of two state judges who gave custody of a young girl to her father who was accused of sexually abusing her. Barbour overturned the lower courts' rulings on the grounds that the custody hearings were perfunctory and therefore infringed on the girl's constitutional right to due process of law. Barbour originally declined to act on what is traditionally a state matter but issued his ruling after a federal appeals court instructed him to do so.

Author: Dadisman, MaryAnn
Publisher: American Bar Association
Publication Name: Human Rights
Subject: Social sciences
ISSN: 0046-8185
Year: 1992
Custody of children, Child custody, Child sexual abuse, Due process of law

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Gay activists seek rights state by state

Article Abstract:

A century-old Texas law against sodomy was overturned in the case of Morales v State of Texas on the grounds that the law violated the Texas Constitution's protection of privacy rights. Attorney J. Patrick Wiseman argued in behalf of five plaintiffs that the law was unconstitutional because no compelling need existed that would justify the intrusion on gay peoples' intimate lives. Moreover, the law's real effect was to deny gay people rights available to others and to increase public hostility toward gays.

Author: Dadisman, MaryAnn
Publisher: American Bar Association
Publication Name: Human Rights
Subject: Social sciences
ISSN: 0046-8185
Year: 1992
Laws, regulations and rules, Discrimination against gays, Privacy, Right of, Right of privacy, Sodomy

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Tomorrow's Jericho? How soon will the wall of separation between church and state come tumbling down?

Article Abstract:

The Supreme Court upheld the separation of church and state in Lee v Weisman, holding that nondenominational prayers at a public school graduation ceremony violated the Establishment Clause even though the ceremony was itself nonsectarian. Prayer at a school graduation, even though nominally voluntary, was also held to contain an element of coercion. With this case, the Supreme Court continued to uphold a 45-year precedent of finding that religion in the public schools is an Establishment Clause violation.

Author: Dadisman, MaryAnn, Richardson, L. Anita
Publisher: American Bar Association
Publication Name: Human Rights
Subject: Social sciences
ISSN: 0046-8185
Year: 1992
Church and state, Religion in the public schools, Religion in schools, Baccalaureate addresses, Commencement addresses

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Cases
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: The variable effects of family background on the timing of first marriage: United States, 1969-1993. The racial context of White mobility: an individual-level assessment of the White flight hypothesis
  • Abstracts: Poverty in the family: Race, siblings, and socioeconomic heterogeneity. Residential segregation and minority home ownership
  • Abstracts: Alcohol control laws and the consumption of distilled spirits and beer. Primitive aspects of consumption in modern American society
  • Abstracts: A consumer values orientation for materialism and its measurement: scale development and validation. After the new wears off: the temporal context of product involvement
  • Abstracts: Effects of interpersonal trust and time pressure on managerial mediation strategy in a simulated organizational dispute
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.