Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Social sciences

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Social sciences

Ghosts in the attic: idealized pluralism, community and hate speech

Article Abstract:

The law is seen as the mediator between the concepts of self and community in classic legal philosophy, and the law's answer to the problem of hate speech would be to censor it because it is destructive to both self and community. Idealized pluralism proposes an alternative answer to the problem. This concept argues that autonomous individuals must freely choose or form their community and law hinders or prevents the development of true community. Hate speech is only destructive when it hinders individuals from participating in community and must be dealt with individually.

Author: Neuborne, Burt
Publisher: Harvard Law School
Publication Name: Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review
Subject: Social sciences
ISSN: 0017-8039
Year: 1992
Beliefs, opinions and attitudes, Censorship, Pluralism

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


A dubious victory for the right of free speech

Article Abstract:

The US Supreme Court, in Simon & Schuster v. New York State Crime Victims Board, struck New York's law authorizing levies on criminals' book earnings to fund crime victims restitution programs as an unconstitutional speech restraint. The decision has ironically been used as a guideline for speech limitation that will pass constitutional muster rather than a victory for free expression. New York legislators have re-drafted the law to cover all of criminals' assets, regardless of source, thus curing the former law's content discrimination and vagueness flaws.

Author: Herrera, Tanya
Publisher: Harvard Law School
Publication Name: Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review
Subject: Social sciences
ISSN: 0017-8039
Year: 1993
Case Note, Prior restraint, Son of Sam laws

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Campaign expenditures and free speech

Article Abstract:

A different critical approach to the US Supreme Court's 1976 opinion in Buckley v. Valeo which focuses on institutional structures is preferable to standard criticisms of the Court's 1st Amendment rationale for striking down campaign expenditure regulations. The Buckley court erred on theoretical and precedential grounds when it did not distinguish subclasses of political speech sourced in and tied to government structures. Regulations of campaign expenditures are constitutional means of maintaining the democratic character of the electoral process.

Author: Baker, C. Edwin
Publisher: Harvard Law School
Publication Name: Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review
Subject: Social sciences
ISSN: 0017-8039
Year: 1998
United States, Campaign funds

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Freedom of speech, Cases
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: A comparison of the dynamics of industrial clustering in computing and biotechnology. Determinants of biotechnology utilization by the Canadian industry
  • Abstracts: Censorship and the Internet: no easy answers. Sexuality and the law. Kids online: what parents can do to protect their children from cyberspace
  • Abstracts: Pursuing equity without getting beat. In defense and pursuit of equity and efficiency. In defence and pursuit of equity: a response
  • Abstracts: Privacy in the new millennium: virtual trespass and other concepts. E-mail in the workplace: limitations on privacy
  • Abstracts: From the private family domain to the public health forum: sexual abuse, women and risk for HIV infection. Discovery, reporting, investigation, and prosecution of child sexual abuse
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.