Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Social sciences

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Social sciences

Goal importance, self-focus, and the goal-setting process

Article Abstract:

In this study we examine the role played by perceived goal importance and self-focus in the goal setting process. More specifically, this study tests the interactive hypotheses that (a) task performance is a function of goal level, self-focus, and perceived goal importance; (b) goal level is a function of perceptions of past performance, self-focus, and perceived goal importance; and (c) perceptions of past performance are a function of actual past performance, self-focus, and perceived goal importance. Hierarchical regression analysis, using a sample of 88 retail salespersons, revealed empirical support for the first two hypotheses. Specifically, the variables described by control theory account for an increment of 6% and 8% of the variance explained in task performance and self-set goal level, respectively. Finally, implications for theory, practice, and future research are discussed.(Reprinted by permission of the publisher.)

Author: Hollenbeck, John R., Williams, Charles R.
Publisher: American Psychological Association, Inc.
Publication Name: Journal of Applied Psychology
Subject: Social sciences
ISSN: 0021-9010
Year: 1987
Psychology, Applied, Applied psychology, Control theory

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Operationalization of goal difficulty as a moderator of the goal difficulty-performance relationship

Article Abstract:

Examined the research studies cumulated in recent quantitative reviews of the relationship between goal difficulty and performance to determine how goal difficulty has been operationalized. Four categories (assigned goal level, self-set goal level, performance improvement, and difficulty perceptions) of operationalization were discovered, and the operationalization of goal difficulty was tested as a moderator of the relationship between goal difficulty and performance. Strong support for this moderating role was found; the different operationalizations accounted for 26% of the variance in effect sizes. Implications for operationalizing goal difficulty in future goal setting research are discussed. (Reprinted by permission of the publisher.)

Author: Wright, Patrick M.
Publisher: American Psychological Association, Inc.
Publication Name: Journal of Applied Psychology
Subject: Social sciences
ISSN: 0021-9010
Year: 1990
Performance

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA



Subjects list: Research, Goal setting
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Work centrality and work alienation: distinct aspects of a general commitment to work. Work-life benefits and positive organizational behavior: is there a connection?
  • Abstracts: Improving the reliability of eyewitness identification: lineup construction and presentation. Improving the reliability of eyewitness identification: putting context into context
  • Abstracts: A work values approach to corporate culture: a field test of the value congruence process and its relationship to individual outcomes
  • Abstracts: Feminist literary criticism and the deconstruction of ads: a postmodern view of advertising and consumer responses
  • Abstracts: Multilevel theory of team decision making: decision performance in teams incorporating distributed expertise. Effect of interpersonal orientation and the sex-type of the task on choosing to work alone or in groups
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.