Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Social sciences

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Social sciences

Impact of family-supportive work variables on work-family conflict and strain: a control perspective

Article Abstract:

The authors examined the direct and indirect effects of organizational policies and practices that are supportive of family responsibilities on work-family conflict and psychological, physical, and behavioral measures of strain. Survey data were gathered at 45 acute-care facilities from 398 health professionals who had children aged 16 years or younger at home. Supportive practices, especially flexible scheduling and supportive supervisors, had direct positive effects on employee perceptions of control over work and family matters. Control perceptions, in turn, were associated with lower levels of work-family conflict, job dissatisfaction, depresesion, somatic complaints, and blood cholesterol. These results suggest that organizations can take steps that can increase employees' control over family responsibilities and that this control might help employees better manage conflicting demands of work and family life. (Reprinted by permission of the publisher.)

Author: Ganster, Daniel C., Thomas, Linda Thiede
Publisher: American Psychological Association, Inc.
Publication Name: Journal of Applied Psychology
Subject: Social sciences
ISSN: 0021-9010
Year: 1995
Psychological aspects, Human resource management, Health care industry, Stress (Psychology), Work and family

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Does training in problem solving improve the quality of group decisions?

Article Abstract:

The efficacy of a training program designed to improve the quality of group decisions by increasing the decision-making capabilities of the group's members was evaluated. A study by Bottger and Yetton (1987) that demonstrated the effectiveness of this approach suffered from design flaws that threatened the internal validity of their conclusion. In the present study, a randomized design with adequate power was used, and the efficacy of this training was not supported for either individual or group decision quality. The data support Bottger and Yetton's contention that member ability is an important contributor to group performance. However, Bottger and Yetton's training program addressed general decision-making ability, whereas task-specific ability may be more important. (Reprinted by permission of the publisher.)

Author: Ganster, Daniel C., Austin, Stone Cold Steve, Poppler, Paul
Publisher: American Psychological Association, Inc.
Publication Name: Journal of Applied Psychology
Subject: Social sciences
ISSN: 0021-9010
Year: 1991
Training, Problem solving, Decision-making, Group, Group decision making

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA



Subjects list: Research
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: The effect of turnover on work satisfaction and mental health: support for a situational perspective. Comments and recommendations regarding the hypothesis testing controversy
  • Abstracts: Appreciative inquiry as a team-development intervention: a controlled experiment. When is appreciative inquiry transformational?: A meta-case analysis
  • Abstracts: Relationships of job and family involvement, family social support, and work-family conflict with job and life satisfaction
  • Abstracts: Impact of management by objectives on organizational productivity. Influence of top management commitment on management program success
  • Abstracts: A task-level assessment of job satisfaction. Work-nonwork conflict and the perceived quality of life. The role of facet importance as a moderator in job satisfaction processes
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2026 Advameg, Inc.