Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Social sciences

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Social sciences

An unbiased correction for sampling error in validity generalization studies

Article Abstract:

A correction for variance due to sampling error is part of all the statistical procedures used to study validity generalization. This correction is analogous to estimation of a variance component in a random effects analysis of variance. The correction usually has a large influence on the results of validity generalization analyses. James, Demaree, and Mulaik (1986) recently questioned the correction for sampling error, suggesting that several of the assumptions required for its derivation are questionable. In this article, I provide an alternative correction for sampling error that is shown to be (exactly) unbiased. A comparison of the calculations involved in the computation of the unbiased correction with the calculations involved in the calculation of the usual correction suggests that the 2 corrections will rarely differ substantially. Hence, the usual correction is not seriously biased. (Reprinted by permission of the publisher.)

Author: Hedges, Larry V.
Publisher: American Psychological Association, Inc.
Publication Name: Journal of Applied Psychology
Subject: Social sciences
ISSN: 0021-9010
Year: 1989
Statistics, Statistics (Data), Analysis of variance, Statistical hypothesis testing

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Intrinsic motivation as influenced by task interdependence and goal setting

Article Abstract:

The effects of task interdependence and goal setting on intrinsic motivation were examined using a laboratory, resource allocation task. A total of 64 managers worked on two tasks, one involving pooled interdependence, and the other, reciprocal interdependence. Results showed an interaction between task interdependence and goal setting affecting intrinsic motivation. In particular, for the task involving pooled interdependence, assigning specific, difficult goals increased intrinsic motivation above that experienced by subjects who were assigned a general goal. However, for the task involving reciprocal interdependence, assigning specific, difficult goals decreased intrinsic motivation below that experienced by subjects who were assigned a general goal. (Reprinted by permission of the publisher.)

Author: Hirst, Mark K.
Publisher: American Psychological Association, Inc.
Publication Name: Journal of Applied Psychology
Subject: Social sciences
ISSN: 0021-9010
Year: 1988
Analysis, Human resource management, Employee motivation, Goal setting, Task analysis

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA



Subjects list: Research
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Improving group performance by training in individual problem solving
  • Abstracts: Occupational complexity, control, and personal income: their relation to psychological well-being in men and women. part 2
  • Abstracts: Comparative effects of personal and situational influences on job outcomes of new professionals. Eliminating the hindsight bias
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.