Introduction: Job analysis - Accuracy versus consequential validity

Article Abstract:

The tendency to use either accuracy or consequential validity as standards for job analysis ratings is discussed in three essays authoried by Juan I. Sanchez and Edward L. Levine, on one side, Frederick P. Morgeson and Michael A. Campion who agree with them, and on the opposite side, Robert J. Harvey and Mark A. Wilson.

Analysis, Authorship, Discriminant analysis, Sanchez, Juan I., Levine, Edward L., Morgeson, Frederick P., Campion, Michael A., Harvey, Robert J., Wilson, Mark A.

---

Accuracy in job analysis: toward an inference-based model

Article Abstract:

Evaluating the accuracy of job analysis by using standard data is considered inadequate and this essay suggests using inferences in the job analysis test process.

Professions, Job evaluation

---

Yes Virginia, there is an objective reality in job analysis

Article Abstract:

Accuracy can be obtained using the objective method in evaluating job analysis, as differentiated from using the subjective process of inferring worker ability, a method this essay rejects.

Job analysis

Similar abstracts:

• Abstracts: Work centrality and work alienation: distinct aspects of a general commitment to work. Work-life benefits and positive organizational behavior: is there a connection?

This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.