Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Social sciences

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Social sciences

Low income housing: the ownership question

Article Abstract:

Home ownership by low-income people is not feasible. 'Deep' housing subsidies are needed to provide low income people with adequate housing. These deep subsidies preclude the possibility of home ownership by low income families. Giving full disposal rights to subsidized housing tenants would be unfair to other segments of society; ownership with restricted disposal rights would give low income families the burdens of home ownership but few of the benefits. The two options left for low income housing are rental units operated by either private landlords or public agencies. The factors to be considered in choosing the best strategy for managing low income housing are the costs of housing to the renter and society, the quality of the housing, the administration of facilities, and the treatment of tenants. The best solution is a mixture of public and private ownership in which the bulk of subsidized property is owned by a public agency.

Author: Meehan, Eugene
Publisher: National Association of Housing and Redevelopment Officials
Publication Name: Journal of Housing
Subject: Social sciences
ISSN: 0272-7374
Year: 1988
Economic aspects, Housing, Home ownership

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Focus on Norfolk, Virginia

Article Abstract:

The Ghent Square and Scattered Site Infill Housing Program (Norfolk, VA), developed by the Norfolk Redevelopment and Housing Authority (NRHA) are singled out for recognition. Development of Ghent Square, a 65 acre, downtown Norfolk residential project began in 1969. The houses built in the final phase of the project sold for around $325,000. On completion, the assessed values in Ghent Square were $2,300,000, and now have reached $24,000,000. Most of the Scattered Site program units were appraised at between $56,600 and $77,000. All the units were built on slabs or crawl spaces, contained three bedrooms, and a minimum of one and one-half baths. Financing for eligible families was provided at five to seven percent.

Publisher: National Association of Housing and Redevelopment Officials
Publication Name: Journal of Housing
Subject: Social sciences
ISSN: 0272-7374
Year: 1990
Management, Virginia, Housing authorities

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA



Subjects list: Finance, Public housing
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Work/life balance: you can't get there from here. A response to Joan Kofodimos. Work/life balance:you can't get there from here
  • Abstracts: Zone pricing. Facility location under zone pricing. The periurban city: why to live between the suburbs and the countryside
  • Abstracts: Predicting the decision to confront or report sexual harassment. To vote or not to vote: abstaining from voting in union representation elections
  • Abstracts: The effects of incidental ad exposure on the formation of consideration sets. Alternative models of categorization: toward a contingent processing framework
  • Abstracts: Toward a comprehensive theory of collaboration. The pathways of my research: a journey of personal engagement and change
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.