Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Social sciences

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Social sciences

Protecting the essence of being

Article Abstract:

Theresa Morelli is a lawyer who is working for laws to govern access to information about genetic disorders. Often healthcare providers supply insurance companies with information concerning genetic disorders, and the insurance companies will automatically deny coverage. Health insurance applications contain information that is sent to a centralized data bank used by insurance companies. Insurance companies deny discrimination, but there are numerous cases documented, some involving fetuses with genetic defects. Morelli hopes to see federal genetic civil rights legislation.

Author: Quade, Vicki
Publisher: American Bar Association
Publication Name: Human Rights
Subject: Social sciences
ISSN: 0046-8185
Year: 1993
Medical records, Access control, Records and correspondence, Genetic disorders

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


State courts: the next frontier for civil liberties

Article Abstract:

Public interest law organizations such as the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) are bringing civil liberties cases to the state courts rather than to the federal courts. This shift in strategy reflects the belief that the US Supreme Court's conservative majority is unlikely to protect individual rights. Conservative public interest law groups that oppose excessive rights are keeping pace with the ACLU's state litigation. The correct use of the state constitutions will be the key to winning these cases.

Author: Quade, Vicki
Publisher: American Bar Association
Publication Name: Human Rights
Subject: Social sciences
ISSN: 0046-8185
Year: 1992
Planning, American Civil Liberties Union, Public interest law

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Beware the dark side of constitutional law: know the differences between state and federal law before you jump into your case

Article Abstract:

Lawyers who plan to handle civil rights cases should be aware of how state law differs from federal law and that the state courts can be preferable to the federal courts for filing complaints. Lawyers should take advantage of the state courts' power to reject the US Supreme Court's rulings on analogue federal rights and to allow greater rights. The US Supreme Court's hostility to individual rights and the superior responsiveness of state law are further reasons for preferring the state courts.

Author: Bamberger, Phylis Skloot
Publisher: American Bar Association
Publication Name: Human Rights
Subject: Social sciences
ISSN: 0046-8185
Year: 1992
Interpretation and construction, Federal courts, Constitutional law, Constitutional interpretation

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Cases, Practice, Civil rights, State courts
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Understanding the effects of color: how the correspondence between available and required resources affects attitudes
  • Abstracts: Tokenism in performance evaluation: the effects of work group representation on male-female and white-black differences in performance ratings
  • Abstracts: Meeting trainees' expectations: the influence of training fulfillment on the development of commitment, self-efficacy, and motivation
  • Abstracts: Strategic bridging: the collaboration between environmentalists and business in the marketing of green products
  • Abstracts: Earnings patterns of Japanese women: 1976-1988. Cross-national analysis of labor force participation of older men and women
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.