Psychopathy, threat, and polygraph test accuracy

Article Abstract:

The accuracy of the control question polygraph test with psychopaths was evaluated within a realistically threatening context. Subjects were 24 psychopathic and 24 nonpsychopathic male prison inmates. Within each diagnostic group, equal numbers of "guilty" and "innocent" subjects were tested by experienced professional polygraphers regarding their involvement in a mock theft by using standard control question procedures. A group contingency threat was devised in which subjects believed that their personal performance could decide benefits or penalties for the sample as a whole. Guilty psychopaths were detected just as easily as guilty nonpsychopaths, and the majority of guilty subjects (87%, excluding inconclusives) were correctly identified. However, innocent subjects were identified with only 56% accuracy and an analysis of false positive errors suggested that the subjective impact of the threat was a critical factor in these outcomes. (Reprinted by permission of the publisher.)

Analysis, Guilt, Guilt (Psychology), Psychology, Pathological, Psychopathology

---

Validity of the control question polygraph test: the problem of sampling bias

Article Abstract:

Sampling bias is a potential problem in polygraph validity studies in which posttest confessions are used to establish ground truth because this criterion is not independent of the polygraph test. In the present study, criterion evidence was sought from polygraph office records and from independent police files for all 402 control question tests (CQTs) conducted during a 5-year period by federal police examiners in a major Canadian city. Based on blind scoring of the charts, the hit rate for criterion innocent subjects (65% of whom were verified by independent sources) was 55%; for guilty subjects (of whom only 2% were verified independently), the hit rate was 98%. Although the estimate for innocent subjects is tenable given the characteristics of the sample on which it is based, the estimate for the guilty subsample is not. Some alternatives to confession studies for evaluating the accuracy of the CQT with guilty subjects are discussed. (Reprinted by permission of the publisher.)

Methods, Evaluation, Statistical sampling, Sampling (Statistics), Criminal investigation

---

Use of antianxiety drugs as countermeasures in the detection of guilty knowledge

Article Abstract:

To evaluate whether antianxiety drugs enable guilty subjects to appear innocent on polygraph tests, we compared the effects of diazepam, meprobamate, and propranolol on the outcome of a guilty knowledge test (GKT). Seventy-five undergraduate students were evenly divided among one innocent and four guilty groups. Subjects in each of the guilty groups received either one of the drugs or a placebo prior to the administration of the GKT and after viewing a videotape that depicted a burglary as seen from the perspective of the burglar. The results showed that drug status had no influence on the outcome of the GKT. Innocent subjects who coincidentally obtained high scores on a recognition memory test covering details of the mock crime tended to obtain higher guilt scores on the GKT. (Reprinted by permission of the publisher.)

Tranquilizing drugs, Tranquilizing agents, Deception, Truthfulness and falsehood

Similar abstracts:

• Abstracts: Validity generalization in the context of situational models. A note on validity generalization procedures
• Abstracts: Distributional ratings, judgment decomposition, and their impact on interrater agreement and rating accuracy. Effects of subsequent performance on evaluations of previous performance

This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.