Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Sociology and social work

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Sociology and social work

Interpersonal reality monitoring: judging the sources of other people's memories

Article Abstract:

The effects of different types of content details on individual judgments about the sources of other people's memories were investigated. Three experiments were conducted to assess whether perceptual or emotional detail influences the believability of reports not contradicted by other reports as well as the interrelationship between people's preconceptions about the speakers' intentions and the level of reported detail. Results showed systematic differences in the types of details used by both high- and low-suspicion individuals to make their judgments.

Author: Mitchell, Karen J., Johnson, Marcia K., Bush, Julie G.
Publisher: Guilford Publications, Inc.
Publication Name: Social Cognition
Subject: Sociology and social work
ISSN: 0278-016X
Year: 1998
Psychological aspects, Judgment, Judgment (Psychology), Belief and doubt, Reality

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


The cued activation of attachment relational schemas

Article Abstract:

The cued activation of acceptance and rejection expectations as a function of chronic attachment orientation has been assessed through a lexical decision task. Subjects were asked to visualize relationships in which they were noncontingently accepted by another person while being administered repeated computer presentations of distinctive tone sequences. Results indicate that people high on the preoccupied orientation activate rejection contingencies while people high on the secure orientation activate acceptance contingencies.

Author: Baldwin, Mark W., Meunier, Jennifer
Publisher: Guilford Publications, Inc.
Publication Name: Social Cognition
Subject: Sociology and social work
ISSN: 0278-016X
Year: 1999
Attachment behavior, Attachment (Psychology), Rejection (Psychology)

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Effects of distraction on interpersonal expectancy effects: a social interaction test of the cognitive busyness hypothesis

Article Abstract:

The hypothesis that cognitive busyness enhances susceptibility to expectancy effects was supported by research results. Cognitively busy perceivers were more likely to respond negatively to targets for whom they had negative expectancies, whereas non-busy perceivers were more prone to compensate for negative expectancies. Thus, cognitive busyness functions as a situational moderator for prediction of expectancy effects.

Author: Harris, Monica J., Perkins, Rebecca
Publisher: Guilford Publications, Inc.
Publication Name: Social Cognition
Subject: Sociology and social work
ISSN: 0278-016X
Year: 1995
Expectation (Psychology), Expectations, Social interaction

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Research, Interpersonal relations, Social perception
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Interpersonal roles in transference: transient mood effects under the condition of significant-other resemblance
  • Abstracts: Intergenerational transmission of violent behavior in adolescent males. Parental influence on children's self-estimated aggressiveness
  • Abstracts: Social work and traditional healing rituals among the Bedouin of the Negev, Israel. Social services and indigenous populations in remote areas: Alaska Natives and Negev Bedouin
  • Abstracts: Defining international social work: A social service agency perspective. Social work ethics: Professional codes in Australia and the United States
  • Abstracts: News coverage of social protests and the effects of photographs and prior attitudes. The effect of viewing varying levels and contexts of violent sports programming on enjoyment, mood, and perceived violence
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.