Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Women's issues/gender studies

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Women's issues/gender studies

Workplace, abortion issues before Supreme Court

Article Abstract:

The National Organization for Women is closely monitoring the outcomes of the abortion, sexual harassment and employment discrimination cases that were filed with the Supreme Court during 1996-1997. Abortion clinic buffer zone is the subject of the Schenck vs. Pro-Choice Network. The Supreme Court is also hearing the Clinton vs. Jones case, which is about sexual harassment allegedly committed by Pres Clinton while he was still the governor of Arkansas. Among the two job discrimination-related cases are Robinson vs. Shell Oil Co and Walters vs. Metropolitan Enterprises Inc.

Author: Roth, Yvonne
Publisher: National Organization for Women
Publication Name: National N O W Times
Subject: Women's issues/gender studies
ISSN: 0149-4740
Year: 1997
Laws, regulations and rules, Sexual harassment, Employment discrimination, Abortion services

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Supreme Court decision shatters all-male bastions

Article Abstract:

The Supreme Court ruled that the Virginia Military Institute (VMI) must admit women into its Corps of Cadets if it wants to remain a public institution. The decision is a big blow to VMI and The Citadel, which are the two remaining publicly funded all-male military institutions. However, it was a big victory for the women's rights movement. After dismissing the possibility of privatization, VMI announced that it will begin admitting women in Fall of 1997. The Citadel has already accepted four women in Aug 1997 in response to the ruling.

Author: Bennett-Haigney, Lisa
Publisher: National Organization for Women
Publication Name: National N O W Times
Subject: Women's issues/gender studies
ISSN: 0149-4740
Year: 1996
Virginia Military Institute

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Promise Keepers fundraising scheme fools media, not NOW

Article Abstract:

The National Organization for Women (NOW) claims that the media campaign by the Promise Keepers (PK) that it is reducing its staff because of financial trouble is merely a cynical fundraising scheme. The radical right group was able to raise $4 million in just one month, half of which were donated by churches. NOW also alleged that PK was never in danger of folding since it had already planned several major rallies prior to its announcement to lay off more than 300 employees.

Author: Bennett-Haigney, Lisa
Publisher: National Organization for Women
Publication Name: National N O W Times
Subject: Women's issues/gender studies
ISSN: 0149-4740
Year: 1998
Management, Finance, Promise Keepers (Denver, Colorado)

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Cases, Women's rights, National Organization for Women
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2026 Advameg, Inc.