Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Zoology and wildlife conservation

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Zoology and wildlife conservation

Another phoenix? The SSC is not dead (yet), but the US Congress may yet force a truly international effort in high-energy physics

Article Abstract:

The House of Representatives' vote against funding the Superconducting Super Collider (SSC) may signal to the international community that the US will no longer be as active in supporting basic research on high-energy physics. However, the need for the House and Senate to reach agreement on the issue may yet win the SSC at least some funding. Nevertheless, the House vote cast doubt on the European High-Energy Physics Laboratory's plans and on Japan's participation in the SSC program. Physicists hope that a decision against the SSC may force the international collaboration they have long advocated.

Publisher: Macmillan Publishing Ltd.
Publication Name: Nature
Subject: Zoology and wildlife conservation
ISSN: 0028-0836
Year: 1992
Science and technology policy, United States. Congress, Nuclear research

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


An accelerator worth fighting for

Article Abstract:

Financial pressures from member states have upset the calculations of the European Laboratory for Particle Physics's (CERN) major accelerator, the Large Hadron Collider (LHC). Despite preference for domestic high energy programs, CERN members accord high priority to LHC physics. Converting to a global facility can help spread the high annual cost of subscription. But given the political realities, a revision of the LHC project appears more feasible. CERN's management needs to deploy its skills to overcome the financial obstacles to the facility.

Publisher: Macmillan Publishing Ltd.
Publication Name: Nature
Subject: Zoology and wildlife conservation
ISSN: 0028-0836
Year: 1996
Economic aspects, Research

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Which accelerator will be next?

Article Abstract:

The inability to secure the future of either the Superconducting Super Collider or the Large Hadron Collider should induce the high-energy physics community to promote international cooperation for these expensive machines. If the US and Japan became members of Organisation Europeenne pour la Recherche Nucleaire, the chances of an internationally sponsored collider being built would be much higher because the individual contribution from each nation should be more reasonable.

Publisher: Macmillan Publishing Ltd.
Publication Name: Nature
Subject: Zoology and wildlife conservation
ISSN: 0028-0836
Year: 1992
Planning, Particle accelerators

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Editorial, Finance, International aspects, Superconducting Super Collider, European Organization for Nuclear Research
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Stable isotopes reveal strong marine and El Nino effects on island food webs. Nutritional constraints in terrestrial and freshwater food webs
  • Abstracts: Leeds disunited: there is no substitute for openness in the handling of allegations of scientific misconduct. Gallo on the rack: the latest government pronouncement raises questions about the office itself as well as about Gallo
  • Abstracts: Patents for genomes? The United States could (and should) do more to prevent the confusion caused by genome patenting
  • Abstracts: Doors open in the private sector. Human frontiers in rough water. What frontiers for Frontier?
  • Abstracts: Patents for genomes? The United States could (and should) do more to prevent the confusion caused by genome patenting. part 2
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.