Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Zoology and wildlife conservation

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Zoology and wildlife conservation

Chlorine industry says EPA rules ignore good science

Article Abstract:

The Chlorine Chemistry Council alleges that the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) did not use the best available scientific information when it established targets for the maximum amount of chloroform permitted in drinking water. EPA scientists undertook an extensive review of chloroform over a five year period, and the EPA concluded as a result of this work that a nonlinear approach is better for extrapolating low-dose cancer risk than a low-dose linear approach. However, the EPA reverted to the linear approach when it ruled in Dec 1998 that the target for chloroform in drinking water should be zero.

Author: Reichhardt, Tony
Publisher: Macmillan Publishing Ltd.
Publication Name: Nature
Subject: Zoology and wildlife conservation
ISSN: 0028-0836
Year: 1999
Health aspects, Standards, Drinking water, Chloroform

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Regulators face questioning on particulate rules

Article Abstract:

The American Lung Association has filed a lawsuit against the EPA after the agency failed to upgrade airborne particulate matter (PM) standards, which should be done every five years. The revision of standards required an evaluation of the risk assessment plan by the agency's Clean Air Scientific Advisory Committee (CASAC). CASAC has rejected an earlier standard proposed by EPA due to insufficient supporting data and lack of a detailed scientific methodology for arriving at the proposed regulations for particulates.

Author: Reichhardt, Tony
Publisher: Macmillan Publishing Ltd.
Publication Name: Nature
Subject: Zoology and wildlife conservation
ISSN: 0028-0836
Year: 1996
Cases, United States. Environmental Protection Agency, Pollutants, American Lung Association

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


US air pollution rules stir up a stink about research

Article Abstract:

A congressional challenge is expected to President Bill Clinton's approval of new US rules on air pollution, which are only slightly looser than the Environmental Protection Agency proposals. Scientists, however, believe that the the issue of new rules could be a way of stimulating greater investment which they feel has been lacking. A further $40 million has already been earmarked for ozone and particulates research.

Author: Reichhardt, Tony
Publisher: Macmillan Publishing Ltd.
Publication Name: Nature
Subject: Zoology and wildlife conservation
ISSN: 0028-0836
Year: 1997
Air Pollution Control, Waste Management and Remediation Services, Air pollution

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Laws, regulations and rules
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Chimps lead evolutionary race. Mark of respect. Old tools shed light on hobbit origins
  • Abstracts: Argonne sees bright future from new photon source. NSF director backs environment studies. State university system sees 'devastating' cuts
  • Abstracts: Calls for human cloning ban 'stem from ignorance.' (World Health Organization working group on human cloning) Pope condemns 'immoral' embryo research
  • Abstracts: Clinton portrays science as the path to racial harmony. Clinton sets a careful course on climate.... Clinton struggles to appease all sides over climate proposals
  • Abstracts: Spatio-temporal frequency domains and their relation to cytochrome oxidase staining in cat visual cortex. Development of identical orientation maps for two eyes without common visual experience
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.