Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Zoology and wildlife conservation

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Zoology and wildlife conservation

Embryo research faces a renewed ban in US

Article Abstract:

A US House of Representatives committee has proposed completely banning research using human embryos at the National Institutes of Health (NIH), following intense pressures from anti-abortion lobbies. The NIH has delayed issuing ethical guidelines for embryonic research, developed on the recommendations of an advisory expert panel, because of concerns of a conservative backlash. NIH funding may be restricted or cut because of this issue despite hopes that the guidelines would allow the NIH not only to fund but also to perform human embryo-based research.

Author: Appel, Adrianne
Publisher: Macmillan Publishing Ltd.
Publication Name: Nature
Subject: Zoology and wildlife conservation
ISSN: 0028-0836
Year: 1995
Laws, regulations and rules, Science and technology policy, United States. National Institutes of Health, United States. Congress. House

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Japanese university approves genetic tests on in vitro embryos

Article Abstract:

The ethics panel of Kagoshima University Medical School has approved a protocol for testing Duchenne muscular dystrophy in human eggs fertilized in vitro. The approval will have to be confirmed by the Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology. The decision has been based on the safety and reliability of the technique and potential benefits, but gaining public acceptance will not be easy according to principal of the university's medical school and chairman of the ethics committee, Akira Hira.

Author: Saegusa, Asako
Publisher: Macmillan Publishing Ltd.
Publication Name: Nature
Subject: Zoology and wildlife conservation
ISSN: 0028-0836
Year: 1999
Japan, Genetic screening, Genetic testing

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


How to restore public trust in science

Article Abstract:

The commercialization of research is largely responsible for the poor relationship between the scientific community and the general public. The main culprits in the devaluing of scientific authority are corporations and politicians, and not necessarily scientists themselves. However the problems can still be acted upon through a reliable scheme of transparency on patents, financial interests and corporate affiliations.

Author: Haerlin, Benny, Parr, Doug
Publisher: Macmillan Publishing Ltd.
Publication Name: Nature
Subject: Zoology and wildlife conservation
ISSN: 0028-0836
Year: 1999

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Research, Ethical aspects, Human embryo
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: No upward trends in the occurrence of extreme floods in central Europe. Europe-wide reduction in primary productivity caused by the heat and drought in 2003
  • Abstracts: Urinary chemical cues affect light avoidance behaviour in male laboratory mice, Mus musculus. High level of circulating testosterone abolishes decline in scent attractiveness in antigen-treated male mice
  • Abstracts: Reflections of a whistle-blower. Fraud and hoaxes in science. Honorary authorship
  • Abstracts: Biological consequences of relocating grizzly bears in the Yellowstone ecosystem. Use of lodgepole pine cover types by Yellowstone grizzly bears
  • Abstracts: Determinants of sperm release and storage in a spiny orbweaving spider. Natal site fidelity in northern fur seals, Callorhinus ursinus
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.