Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Zoology and wildlife conservation

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Zoology and wildlife conservation

How to publish the unpalatable?

Article Abstract:

J. Philippe Rushton's research on differences in intelligence quotient (IQ) between the Asian, white and black races affirms the principle that science journals should require strong evidence before publishing radically new theories. Rushton, a University of Western Ontario professor, claims to have demonstrated racial IQ variation based on analysis of cranial measurements of 6,325 US Army personnel. However, Rushton's unwarranted assumption that what is true for Army personnel is also true for the general population undermines his research and justifies not publishing it.

Author: Maddox, John
Publisher: Macmillan Publishing Ltd.
Publication Name: Nature
Subject: Zoology and wildlife conservation
ISSN: 0028-0836
Year: 1992
Research, Ethical aspects, Race, Craniometry, Intelligence (Psychology), Science publishing, Intelligence levels, Rushton, J. Philippe

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Systematic errors in 'Big G'?

Article Abstract:

Determination of the value of Newton's gravitational constant, G, using the torsion balance method gives a biased result because of the damping effect of the material of the wire used to suspend the weight. The frequency of oscillation affects the torsion force in the wire and thereby changes the value of G. The elastic constants in systems with a high frequency of oscillations are different from those with low frequency-oscillations. In systems with low frequency oscillations the distortions are less because of the greater time period.

Author: Maddox, John
Publisher: Macmillan Publishing Ltd.
Publication Name: Nature
Subject: Zoology and wildlife conservation
ISSN: 0028-0836
Year: 1995
Analysis, Measurement, Gravity, Gravity (Force), Constants, Physical, Constants (Physics), Errors, Scientific, Scientific errors

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Polite row about models in biology

Article Abstract:

A recent public debate at the Linnean Society of London between Professor John Maynard Smith of Sussex and Dr. Stuart Kauffman of Santa Fe Institute once again failed to focus on the role of mathematical modelling in biology. The debate was on Kauffman's mathematical models of evolution, with Kauffman arguing about the simultaneous operation of self-organization and natural selection. The debate failed to highlight the heuristic value of models in biology.

Author: Maddox, John
Publisher: Macmillan Publishing Ltd.
Publication Name: Nature
Subject: Zoology and wildlife conservation
ISSN: 0028-0836
Year: 1995
Models, Evaluation, Biology, Heuristic, Heuristics (Psychology)

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA

Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: How do cuckoos find their hosts? The role of habitat imprinting. When is habitat assessment an advantage when foraging?
  • Abstracts: Roosevelt, conservation, and the revival of democracy. It's about time: conservation biology and history. Diversity: Striking a balance
  • Abstracts: Cosmology back to the beginning. Dark matter comes in from the cold. Beyond the inflationary border
  • Abstracts: Sighting the seas of Europa: planetary exploration. Sublime solar system ices. Killer acid at the K/T boundary
  • Abstracts: Mulling over mouse models. Cloning the Menkes disease gene
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.