Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Zoology and wildlife conservation

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Zoology and wildlife conservation

Neural computation of log likelihood in control of saccadic eye movements

Article Abstract:

The lapse between the appearance of a target and the beginning of rapid eye movements cannot be explained by ordinary processes such as synaptic delays and conduction velocities, but the decision signal can be considered as a neural estimate of the log likelihood of the assumption that the target is present. The appearance of a target produces a signal in a decision unit to rise in a linear from at the rate 'r' from its initial value s(sub 0) until a certain threshold is reached when the eye movement starts.

Author: Carpenter, R. H. S., Williams, M. L. L.
Publisher: Macmillan Publishing Ltd.
Publication Name: Nature
Subject: Zoology and wildlife conservation
ISSN: 0028-0836
Year: 1995
Analysis, Visual evoked response, Visual evoked potentials

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Illusory shifts in visual direction accompany adaptation of saccadic eye movements

Article Abstract:

It is shown, by way of perceptual illusion, that traditional cancellation theories do not explain stability. The illusion showed that perceptual localization is based on signals that represent the size of the initially-intended saccade, rather than the size of the saccade that is ultimately executed. Signals that represent intended saccades lead to a visual comparison process that maintains perceptual stability throughout saccades.

Author: Bahcall, Dan O., Kowler, Eileen
Publisher: Macmillan Publishing Ltd.
Publication Name: Nature
Subject: Zoology and wildlife conservation
ISSN: 0028-0836
Year: 1999
Perception, Perception (Psychology)

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Premotor commands encode monocular eye movements

Article Abstract:

The coordination of binocular eye movements was debated by Hering and Helmholtz over 100 years ago, with Hering believing that binocular movements were innervated by common command signals and Helmholtz stating that each eye is independently controlled. A new study shows that Hering's hypothesis is probably incorrect. Details of the findings are presented.

Author: Zhou, Wu, King, W.M.
Publisher: Macmillan Publishing Ltd.
Publication Name: Nature
Subject: Zoology and wildlife conservation
ISSN: 0028-0836
Year: 1998
Binocular vision

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Eye, Eye movements, Research
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Shared neural control of attentional shifts and eye movements. Neural progenitor cell engraftment corrects lysosomal storage throughout the MPS VII mouse brain
  • Abstracts: Role for a Xenopus Orc2-related protein in controlling DNA replication. Springtime in the desert
  • Abstracts: Gold concentrations of magmatic brines and the metal budget of porphyry copper deposits. Forest-killing diffuse CO2 emission at Mammoth Mountain as a sign of magmatic unrest
  • Abstracts: Evaluation of translocation for the threatened Florida scrub-jay. Patterns and consequences of egg destruction among joint-nesting acorn woodpeckers
  • Abstracts: Voltage-dependent anchoring of a nematic liquid crystal on a grating surface. Continuous grey-scale image storage using optically aligned nematic liquid crystals
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.