Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Zoology and wildlife conservation

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Zoology and wildlife conservation

Relative precision and sources of bias in pronghorn sex and age composition surveys

Article Abstract:

Age and sex composition surveys are valuable wildlife management tools but their precision is ill understood. Research shows that ground composition surveys are often inaccurate and highly variable. A comparison of ground and aerial composition surveys of pronghorns in Wyoming is presented. A study of six comparisons shows that three ground surveys yielded higher adult buck ratios than aerial surveys. Observations in three out of 12 ground surveys show differences, while five out of 12 aerial surveys differed. Neither method was seen to be more precise.

Author: Lindzey, Frederick G., Woolley, Timothy P.
Publisher: Wildlife Society
Publication Name: The Journal of Wildlife Management
Subject: Zoology and wildlife conservation
ISSN: 0022-541X
Year: 1997
Methods, Observations, Wildlife research, Wyoming, Pronghorn antelope, Pronghorns

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Development and evaluation of sightability models for summer elk surveys

Article Abstract:

Elk herd segments in the Grand Teton National Park congregate in winter ranges where they often mix, making it important that management agencies know the composition and size of individual herds so that an equitable hunting strategy can be formulated. A new study seeks to develop predictive sightability models for the estimation of elk population and age-sex ratios using summer aerial surveys of radiocollared elk. The new models are compared with the winter elk sightability Idaho model.

Author: Smith, Bruce L., Lindzey, Frederick G., Moody, David S., Anderson, Charles R., Jr., Lanka, Robert P.
Publisher: Wildlife Society
Publication Name: The Journal of Wildlife Management
Subject: Zoology and wildlife conservation
ISSN: 0022-541X
Year: 1998
Research, Measurement, Red deer, Elk, Elk (Wapiti), Grand Teton National Park, Wyoming

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Population characteristics of sympatric mule and white-tailed deer on Rock Mountain Arsenal, Colorado

Article Abstract:

A comparison of mule deer and white-tailed deer populations near Denver, Colorado, show mule deer outnumber white-tailed deer by a ratio of four to one, and mule deer fawns survive white-tailed deer fawns by a ratio of two to one. These baseline figures account for the three-to-one difference in perceived population growth rates between the mule deer and the white-tailed deer, respectively.

Author: Whittaker, Donald G., Lindzey, Frederick G.
Publisher: Wildlife Society
Publication Name: The Journal of Wildlife Management
Subject: Zoology and wildlife conservation
ISSN: 0022-541X
Year: 2001
Colorado, Environmental aspects, White-tailed deer, Mule deer

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Natural history, Animal populations
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Tradeoff between resistance and tolerance to herbivore damage in a morning glory. Co-evolution and plant resistance to natural enemies
  • Abstracts: Locomotion and grooming in crickets: competition or time sharing? Grooming, competition and social rank among female primates: a meta-analysis
  • Abstracts: Phylogenetic history of social evolution and habitat use in the Aphelocoma jays. Social learning of a novel foraging patch in families of free-living Florida scrub-jays
  • Abstracts: German physicians warn of genetics risks. Biologists join the dots. Top researchers plan to snub fertility conference
  • Abstracts: Avoidance of cabins, roads, and power lines by reindeer during calving. Movements and home range dynamics of cottontail rabbits in Mississippi
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.