Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Zoology and wildlife conservation

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Zoology and wildlife conservation

US panel rejects hiding source of allegations of misconduct

Article Abstract:

The Public Health Service's (PHS) committee on scientific integrity urged the PHS to give up trying to exclude itself from the rule allowing researchers access to files that could be used to support misconduct charges. The PHS had hoped to win an amendment to the 1974 Privacy Act that would empower it to keep the files secret. In addition, the National Science Foundation's proposed conflict-of-interest rules for government-employed scientists are being widely denounced among the scientific fraternity. Congress may include conflict-of-interest legislation in the National Institutes of Health reauthorization bill.

Author: Anderson, Christopher
Publisher: Macmillan Publishing Ltd.
Publication Name: Nature
Subject: Zoology and wildlife conservation
ISSN: 0028-0836
Year: 1992

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Safeguards added for appeals in misconduct cases

Article Abstract:

The Public Health Service (PHS) has responded to criticism that federal investigation procedures into scientific misconduct do not allow fair means for defense by adopting new court-like procedures. The Office of Research Integrity or any specific PHS institution must allow scientists accused of misconduct the right to defense by a lawyer, cross examination of witnesses and examination of evidence. Furthermore, any scientist found guilty of misconduct will have the right to review of the case by an administrative judge. These new regulations may entail costly legal expenses for scientists.

Author: Anderson, Christopher
Publisher: Macmillan Publishing Ltd.
Publication Name: Nature
Subject: Zoology and wildlife conservation
ISSN: 0028-0836
Year: 1992
Ethical aspects, Scientists, Fraud in science, Science fraud

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


NSF's proposed conflict-of-interest rules place burden on applicant and institution

Article Abstract:

The National Science Foundation (NSF) is considering conflict-of-interest rules that would force applicants for research grants to reveal all relevant financial associations and to enforce a wide-ranging policy for resolving any such conflicts. The proposed rules were made public in the Jul 16, 1992 Federal Register. NSF officials argue that these rules will not be unduly burdensome and costly to institutions and that data gained from the policy will confirm that genuine cases of conflict-of-interest are infrequent.

Author: Anderson, Christopher
Publisher: Macmillan Publishing Ltd.
Publication Name: Nature
Subject: Zoology and wildlife conservation
ISSN: 0028-0836
Year: 1992
Research grants, Research funding

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Laws, regulations and rules, Conflict of interests (Agency), United States. National Science Foundation, United States. Public Health Service, Conflicts of interest
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Genetic effects of multiple generations of supportive breeding. Application of the One-Migrant-per-Generation Rule to Conservation and Management
  • Abstracts: European Patent Office rejects bid to revoke first plant patent. EPO verdict lifts patent coverage of seeds
  • Abstracts: Spin-up and recovery in the 1989 glitch of the Crab pulsar. Birth rate of millisecond pulsars. Discovery of a very bright, nearby binary millisecond pulsar
  • Abstracts: German professors appeal their dismissals in purge of thousands with ties to Stasi. Post-war ideals trip over modern reality: Pressures are mounting to bring in radical reforms to German universities to reduce bureaucracy and give a boost to scientific research
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.