Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Business

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Business

Directional stimulus-response compatibility: a test of three alternative principles

Article Abstract:

A study was conducted to determine the basis of directional stimulus-response compatibility using a task resembling the operation of industrial and construction equipment. Visual Field (VF), Control Display and Muscle Synergy compatibilities were compared in all combinations. Results confirmed the viability of VF compatibility as a principle that may be applied to the design of human-machine systems. A significant relationship was found between this finding and the theoretical aspects of stimulus-response compatibility.

Author: Worringham, Charles J., Beringer, Dennis B.
Publisher: Taylor & Francis Ltd.
Publication Name: Ergonomics
Subject: Business
ISSN: 0014-0139
Year: 1998
Research, Conditioned response, Conditioned responses, Stimulus satiation

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Naive and experienced judgments of stimulus-response compatibility: implications for interface design

Article Abstract:

Experimental analysis of naive and experienced judgments of stimulus-response compatibility is described. The findings indicate that naive judgments for different stimulus- response (S-R) mappings are not accurate and suggested that designers may not be able to predict whether a particular display-control configuration would lead to better performance than another.

Author: Proctor, Robert W., Vu, Kim-Phong L.
Publisher: Taylor & Francis Ltd.
Publication Name: Ergonomics
Subject: Business
ISSN: 0014-0139
Year: 2003
Analysis, Compatible hardware, Compatibility (Computers), Upward/downward compatibility, Compatible software, Forward compatibility, Stimuli (Psychology), Configuration management

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Convex rear view mirrors compromise distance and time-to-contact judgments

Article Abstract:

The way in which distances and events that are temporal are distorted when the mirror is the only perceptual access to a relevant object is discussed. The results revealed that the convex mirrors lead to more variance in distance and spacing estimations as compared to concave mirrors.

Author: Hecht, Heiko, Brauer, Julia
Publisher: Taylor & Francis Ltd.
Publication Name: Ergonomics
Subject: Business
ISSN: 0014-0139
Year: 2007
Methods, Usage, Rearview mirrors, Distances, Distance measurement, Report

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA

Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Health care facilities. Comparing the impact of news: a tale of three health care sectors. Synergy Healthcare
  • Abstracts: International investment restrictions and closed-end country fund prices. Short Sales Restrictions and Kings on the Mean Variance Frontier
  • Abstracts: Reliance on accounting information, budgetary participation, and task uncertainty: tests of a three-way interaction
  • Abstracts: Earnings management and the corporate alternative minimum tax
  • Abstracts: Earnings management and the corporate alternative minimum tax. part 2 Inflation illusion and post-earnings-announcement drift
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2023 Advameg, Inc.