Rumors & lies: the parameters of liability for commercial free speech

Article Abstract:

The case of Proctor and Gamble Co. v. Amway Corp., in which P&G sued Amway over a distributor's dissemination of rumors that P&G funded Satanism, is presented. Under the Lanham Act, the case hinges on whether there was an economic motivation for the rumors and thus qualifies as commercial speech.

Author: del Castillo, Diamela
Acquisitions & mergers, Soap, Cleaners, and Toilet Goods, Soap, Cleaning Compound, and Toilet Preparation Manufacturing, Soaps, Detergents & Toiletries, Polishes and sanitation goods, Polishes & Sanitation Goods, Polish and Other Sanitation Good Manufacturing, Toiletries industry, Procter & Gamble Co., Consumer goods industry, PG, Soap and cleaning agents industry, Cleaning agents industry, Commercial speech doctrine, Amway Corp., Satanism

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Some confusion remains after Supreme Court's "fair use" decision

Article Abstract:

The details on the Supreme Court's decision on the issue of fair use in KP Permanent Make-Up, Inc. v. Lasting Impression I, Inc. are examined.

Author: Burgunder, Lee
Toilet preparations, Cosmetics industry, Trademark infringement

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Are mailing lists protected free speech? Despite dissent, the Supreme Court remains silent

Article Abstract:

The identification of Trans Union's mailing lists by the US Federal Trade Commission is discussed.

Author: McKinney, Brian
Other Justice, Public Order, and Safety Activities, Free Speech & Assembly, United States. Federal Trade Commission, Lease and rental services industry, Lease and rental services, Trans Union Corp., Credit bureaus, Administrative agencies, Government agencies, Trans Union L.L.C., Mailing lists

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: United States, Cases, Freedom of speech, Company legal issue
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.