In the courts
Article Abstract:
A legal case between Brubfitt v Ministry of Defence (27th July 2004) wherein the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) has recently ruled that, in case of a sexual harassment, any woman complaining on the issue can succeed if in a claim of direct sex discrimination she has been less favorably treated than an actual or hypothetical male comparator is presented.
Publisher: Eclipse Publications Ltd.
Publication Name: Equal Opportunities Review
Subject: Human resources and labor relations
ISSN: 0268-7143
Year: 2004
Sexual Harassment, United Kingdom. Ministry of Defence, United Kingdom. Employment Appeal Tribunal
Publication Name: Equal Opportunities Review
Subject: Human resources and labor relations
ISSN: 0268-7143
Year: 2004
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
Gender - based assumptions lead to discriminatory dismissal
Article Abstract:
A legal case, Porter v Lamvel Construction Ltd wherein a woman claimed discrimination on grounds of sex, is presented.
Publisher: Eclipse Publications Ltd.
Publication Name: Equal Opportunities Review
Subject: Human resources and labor relations
ISSN: 0268-7143
Year: 2004
Construction, Engineering Services, Engineering & Architectural Svcs, HEAVY CONSTRUCTION, EX. BUILDING, GENERAL BUILDING CONTRACTORS, Construction industry
Publication Name: Equal Opportunities Review
Subject: Human resources and labor relations
ISSN: 0268-7143
Year: 2004
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
Subjects list: United Kingdom, Company legal issue, Cases, Sex discrimination
Similar abstracts:
- Abstracts: In the courts. New anti-discrimination body for France
- Abstracts: Failure to retain in alternative role. Misconception over mental health leads to discriminatory dismissal
- Abstracts: 175,000 pounds sterling compensation for indirect sex discrimination. Risk of inefficiency does not outweigh discrimination in refusing flexible working
- Abstracts: 120,545 pounds sterling compensation where victim of sex discrimination suffers major depressive disorder
- Abstracts: Requirement to cover for job--share partner not justifiable
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.