Indian and Pakistani views on nuclear deterrence
Article Abstract:
Indian and Pakistani strategic thinking on nuclear deterrence is still to take shape. A favorable recognition of a low-level deterrence between the two countries exists, though it is hardly well-defined. The strategists of these countries profess to consider open deployments of nuclear weapons under the guise of minimum deterrence. However, opinions differ among them about the nature of minimum deterrence and its effectiveness. This entails further study of such opinions with special reference to their influence on the normalization of Indo-Pak relations.
Publication Name: Comparative Strategy
Subject: International relations
ISSN: 0149-5933
Year: 1996
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
Nuclear weapons in South Asia: more may be manageable
Article Abstract:
Nuclear proliferation in India and Pakistan could have a number of effects on the management of conflicts between the two countries. The two countries have opposing policies on a range of issues, so conflicts look set to continue. The possession of nuclear weapons by both India and Pakistan could increase the number of limited conventional conflicts due to their permissive effect, but the example of US-Soviet relations in the cold war era indicates that they could prevent the occurrence of a large-scale war.
Publication Name: Comparative Strategy
Subject: International relations
ISSN: 0149-5933
Year: 1997
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
Deterrence is not enough: security requirements for the 21st century
Article Abstract:
A short history of offensive and defensive weapons, Cold War strategy, the Strategic Defense Initiative, arms control and the ABM Treaty is presented with a view to analyze international security arrangements for the 21st century. The countries of North America and Europe cannot assume that they will be invulnerable to missile attack. For this reason, an ABM Treaty can serve both as a deterrent against missile attack and a stabilizing factor for the US and its allies.
Publication Name: Comparative Strategy
Subject: International relations
ISSN: 0149-5933
Year: 1999
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
- Abstracts: The role of nuclear forces in U.S. national security strategy: implications of the B-2 bomber. Rationale and requirements for U.S. nuclear forces and arms control: executive report
- Abstracts: Labor and the bomb: The first 80 years. Nuclear disarmament versus peace in the twenty-first century. The future of United Kingdom nuclear weapons: Shaping the debate
- Abstracts: Bashar's Syria: The regime and its strategic worldview. Next front? Evolving United States-African strategic relations in the war on terrorism and beyond
- Abstracts: Chemical and biological weapons: issues and alternatives. Russia's strategic nuclear deterrent: Realistic or uncertain?
- Abstracts: Rethinking US defence planning. The Persian Gulf remains the strategic prize. The United States and the Persian Gulf: preventing regional hegemony