Consultation regulations under fire
Article Abstract:
Michael Meacher of the UK Labour Party attacked the Collective Redundancies and Transfers of Undertakings Regulations 1995 during a House of Commons debate in Feb, 1996. He said the regulations promoted union derecognition, failed to outline employee representative election procedures, and imposed a 20-employee redundancy consultation threshold designed to circumvent existing protections. Consumer Affairs Minister John Taylor defended the regulations as cost-saving, efficient, deregulatory, and providing adequate consultation requirements.
Publication Name: Industrial Relations Law Bulletin
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0969-3637
Year: 1996
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
Definition of "establishment" under Collective Redundancies Directive
Article Abstract:
The European Court of Justice, ruling in the 1996 Rockfon A/S case, held the EC Collective Redundancies Directive's definition of "establishment" to mean the redundant workers' individual work unit. The aggregate numbers of workers within a corporate group of associated companies cannot be the basis for determining redundancies or defining an establishment under the Directive. The implications of this ruling for UK companies remain unclear.
Publication Name: Industrial Relations Law Bulletin
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0969-3637
Year: 1996
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
Part-timer's redundancy pay claims time-barred
Article Abstract:
The UK's Employment Appeals Tribunal ruled against three part-time workers' claims for redundancy pay, stating the industrial tribunal lacked the jurisdiction to hear the claim. The workers' claims were barred because they brought the under the Employment Protection Act, which sets a six-month limit for such claims. Their claims might have been allowed if they had brought them under Article 119 of the Treaty of Rome.
Publication Name: Industrial Relations Law Bulletin
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0969-3637
Year: 1995
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
- Abstracts: Constitutional structure. Criminal law and procedure. Commerce Clause
- Abstracts: Hairsplitting under I.R.C. section 2035(d): the cause and the cure. Paying administration expenses out of income attributable to marital and charitable residuary bequests: double dipping or appropriate accounting?
- Abstracts: Confusion over consultation requirements. Consultation on new strike restrictions
- Abstracts: Objective justification of pay differential only necessary where explanation is discriminatory. No right to full pay during maternity leave
- Abstracts: Potential barriers to the adoption of an HIV vaccine by at-risk individuals. The French blood transfusion system on trial