Courting justice: addressing gender bias in the judicial system
Article Abstract:
A proposal for addressing gender bias in the justice system combines a two-tiered standard for gender bias with proactive measures such as policy statements and educational efforts. The two-tiered standard includes a relatively low threshold for harm caused by the gender-biased behavior, followed by a more restrictive discourse-limiting tier. Sanctions would thus be applicable only in situations in which discourse is limited, as, for example, when a female attorney who has been subjected to bias is constrained by her duty to represent her client. The gender bias standard is reactive, however, and should be combined with proactive methods.
Publication Name: Annual Survey of American Law
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0066-4413
Year: 1996
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
The forum non conveniens doctrine and the judicial protection of multinational corporations from forum shopping plaintiffs
Article Abstract:
Multinational corporations are particularly susceptible to forum shoppers in the US due to liberal in personam jurisdiction, venue, and pro-plaintiff laws. Forum shopping can be reduced by continued application of the doctrine of forum non conveniens. The doctrine has been criticized for lack of uniform application due to judicial discretion and a weak standard of review. The critics do not appreciate the flexibility the doctrine allows.
Publication Name: University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Economic Law
Subject: Law
ISSN: 1086-7872
Year: 1998
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
Major league baseball's disempowered Commissioner: judicial ramifications of the 1994 restructuring
Article Abstract:
Changes in the governmental structure of the office of the Commissioner of baseball in 1994 may result in litigation and loss of the antitrust exemption. The exemption and historic freedom from judicial intervention enjoyed by the Commissioner is rooted in the 'best interests' of the game power which is a very broad power. Structural changes which limit that power may cause the judiciary to remove the benefits flowing from it.
Publication Name: Columbia Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0010-1958
Year: 1997
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
- Abstracts: Funding equal justice: state commissions studying bias in courts hampered by budget constraints. Justice: the new commodity
- Abstracts: Preventing terrorist fundraising in the United States. Auditing systems: SHARP at LDDC. Preventing fraudulent reporting; auditing for honesty
- Abstracts: Procedural and distributive justice: examining equity in a university setting. Tax avoidance and the European Court of Justice: what is at stake for European General Anti-Avoidance Rules?
- Abstracts: Growing a green marketing strategy. ADR: a problem-solving approach for business. A simplified marketing approach for split-interest trusts
- Abstracts: Historical foundations of the law of evidence: a view from the Ryder sources. Spoliation of evidence - a primer