Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

Defining punishment: courts split on notification provisions of sex offender laws

Article Abstract:

All 50 states have enacted versions of 'Megan's law,' requiring the registration of convicted molesters of children. Such laws have survived many constitutional challenges ranging from due process to ex post facto. Courts have concluded that registration does not differ from other incidental consequences of criminal convictions. At least 20 of these states have, however, also required public notification of a sex offender's presence in the community, which some courts have found to violate the ex post facto laws. The US Supreme Court is likely to take up the ex post facto issue with respect to sex offenders.

Author: Gibeaut, John
Publisher: American Bar Association
Publication Name: ABA Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0747-0088
Year: 1997
Cases, Laws, regulations and rules, Sex offenders, Ex post facto laws, states

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


ABA backs unified family courts

Article Abstract:

Various ABA entities including the ABA Steering Committee on the Unmet Legal Needs of Children are proposing a unified family court system to make the courts respond better to dysfunctional families and prevent child abuse. Such a system would have jurisdiction over all domestic matters including divorce, child custody and visitation, alimony and child support, adoption, domestic violence and child abuse. Other ABA entities which have been investigating family law matters are described.

Author: Gibeaut, John
Publisher: American Bar Association
Publication Name: ABA Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0747-0088
Year: 1997
Management, Cover Story, Family courts

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Ruling every which way; courts cautiously explore the strange, new tests for DNA

Article Abstract:

Advances in DNA testing are proceeding apace, but judicial acceptance of these tests in court seems to have stalled. Restrcition fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) was the DNA test first to appear in court, while polymerase chain reaction typing (PCR) is the latest innovation. The latter has two significant advantages, its ability to use older, degraded examples and need for only a very small amount of material. PCR is, however, much more susceptible to error than RFLP testing.

Author: Gibeaut, John
Publisher: American Bar Association
Publication Name: ABA Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0747-0088
Year: 1998
Innovations, DNA testing, DNA identification

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: United States
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Prevention versus punishment: toward a principled distinction in the restraint of released sex offenders
  • Abstracts: McVeigh's trial lean and trim; judge and prosecutors lauded, but defense gets mixed reviews. Impact in absentia: at-large bombing suspect John Doe No. 2 to figure in trial
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.