Discovery is a waste of time and money
Article Abstract:
Discovery is a major contributor to the congestion of US courts. No evidence has shown that discovery aids in disputes being settled more fairly. Instead, evidence shows that discovery takes far too long, costs too much and does not change the outcome of most cases. By limiting discovery, the US District Court of Virginia Eastern District has managed to cut costs and ease congestion.
Publication Name: Arbitration Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0003-7893
Year: 1992
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
Discovery should not be abolished
Article Abstract:
Doing away with discovery would only make for more congestion and less fairness at trial. Before discovery rules were passed, attorneys did not have access to documents that would be helpful to their clients and third parties had to be subpoenaed if they did not want to cooperate. A return to such conditions would not help settle cases in or out of court.
Publication Name: Arbitration Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0003-7893
Year: 1992
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
Discovery; does it pay to pay witnesses?
Article Abstract:
Attorneys are allowed to voluntarily pay expert witnesses but doing so may subject them to sanction. Witnesses cannot demand payment, however, and payment for lost time must be reasonable. Many cases on the topic are reviewed.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1999
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
- Abstracts: Yes: litigants deserve a justice with an open mind. No: the costs would be too high. Yes: victims deserve justice no less than defendants
- Abstracts: Corporate finance and disclosure. Disclosure of corporate wrongdoing
- Abstracts: Codetermination and corporate governance in a multinational business enterprise. Corporate governance in America 1950-2000: major changes but uncertain benefits
- Abstracts: Once a rapist? Motivational evidence and relevancy in rape law. Making sense of rules of privilege under the structural (il)logic of the Federal Rules of Evidence
- Abstracts: How many remedies make a tort? The aftermath of U.S. v. Burke and its impact on the taxability of discrimination awards