Gentile's unanswered questions; drafters struggle to rewrite ethics rules on lawyers' out-of-court statements
Article Abstract:
The US Supreme Court addressed in 1991 in Gentile v State Bar of Nevada how much an attorney may ethically disclose to the press, upholding the ABA Model Rule 3.6 provision disciplining attorneys for statements outside court which are likely to prejudice a trial. Five of the justices felt that the rule's 'safe harbor' provision was vague, but attempts by the ABA Standing Committee on Ethics and Professional Responsibility to clarify the rule have not succeeded.
Publication Name: ABA Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0747-0088
Year: 1993
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
Sex-with-client ban fails; Ore. bar rejects ethics rule; advocates slowed elsewhere
Article Abstract:
The Oregon State Bar voted down a disciplinary rule banning sex with clients on Oct 4, 1992, despite its unanimous recommendation by the bar's Board of Governors. Similar efforts have been slowed by courts in California and Illinois. Oregon attorneys are divided on the rule's necessity. Although the bar receives few complaints, some attorneys feel the ban will put clients and the public at ease.
Publication Name: ABA Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0747-0088
Year: 1992
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
Fifty hours for pro bono; ABA House adopts ethics rule specifying how much time lawyers should donate
Article Abstract:
The ABA House of Delegates has approved an ethics rule urging attorneys to do 50 hours of pro bono legal services annually and that most of this should go towards legal assistance to the poor. The standard was not made mandatory, meaning that attorneys falling short will not be disciplined. Arizona, Florida, Georgia and Kentucky are adopting similar rules.
Publication Name: ABA Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0747-0088
Year: 1993
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
- Abstracts: Driven to defection; fed up with insurers' auditors, defense lawyers go to work for plaintiffs. Five more leave Graham & James; the group defection follows a year of declining profits and the departures of other key partners
- Abstracts: Divvying up war chests; debate over campaign finance reform focuses on 'soft money.' Take the pain out of contributing; complexities of campaign finance laws can cause the unwary to stumble
- Abstracts: The avoidance of constitutional questions and the preservation of judicial review: federal court treatment of the new habeas provisions
- Abstracts: Class actions are the '90's form of greenmail. Grounded by the IRS; the Ninth Circuit ruled that two IRS lawyers committed fraud in a tax case
- Abstracts: Bar seeks indigent defense money; Tenn. petititon cites inadequate lawyer pay, overworked defenders. Commissioners jailed over fees; when counties won't pay for indigent defense, lawyers turn to courts