I hear ya' knockin', so you can come in: the Americans with Disabilities Act limited to physical structures and individualized discrimination under Parker v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co
Article Abstract:
Thw US Court of Appeals for the 6th Circuit incorrectly ruled in Parker v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co.that Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) did not apply to employer-provided insurance plans administered by insurance companies. The court's assumption that defining places of accommodation as physical structures somehow exempted insurance offices from Title III when the insurance office discriminated indirectly through an employer-provided benefit plan was incorrect. By allowing insurance companies to refuse coverage for mental disabilities, the courts will permit companies to circumvent the ADA's purpose to protect people with these disabilities.
Publication Name: The Journal of Corporation Law
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0360-795X
Year: 1998
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
Will ERISA's newly defined welfare benefit noninterference clause curb outsourcing?
Article Abstract:
The US Supreme Court 1997 decision in Inter-Modal Rail Employees Ass'n v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway allowed both vested benefits and unvested welfare benefits to employees whose jobs were lost due to outsourcing. The decision supports ERISA section 510 employee rights but does not prevent employers from amending benefits. Businesses will continue to cut costs by outsourcing, and litigation over section 510 will continue.
Publication Name: Delaware Journal of Corporate Law
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0364-9490
Year: 1998
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
- Abstracts: HIV disease and disparate impact under the Americans with Disabilities Act: a federal prohibition of discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation?
- Abstracts: This estoppel has got to stop: judicial estoppel and the Americans with Disabilities Act. The benefits of applying issue preclusion to interlocutory judgments in cases that settle
- Abstracts: Commercial power and competitor litigation. Choice of law in tort in domestic and international litigation. The court-room economist in Australian antitrust litigation: an underutilised resource?
- Abstracts: Fishing for markets: regulation and ocean fishing. Purer politics, greasier pigs and other wonders of campaign reform
- Abstracts: At the intersection of bankruptcy and divorce: property division debts under the Bankruptcy Reform Act of 1994