In a dearth of disclosure lies exposure; the 'bespeaks caution' doctrine and safe-harbor rules do not eliminate the need for policies governing corporate disclosures
Article Abstract:
Well-planned communications management can reduce legal liability, raise a company's credibility, and enhance shareholder relations, but solid ground rules founded on an understanding of applicable laws and regulations are essential. Companies only have a duty to disclose even material information due to SEC filing requirements, the duty to correct erroneous statements, the duty to update if past statements become invalid, and the disclose-or-abstain rule. Materiality, selective disclosure, and other topics are addressed.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1996
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
New system links securities markets: 'FIPS' disclosure regime facilitates equity offerings by foreign issuers in Canada
Article Abstract:
Canada's revised Foreign Issuer Prospectus and Continuous Disclosure System (FIPS) builds on the successful multijurisdictional disclosure system (MJDS) to facilitate public offerings in Canada by foreign issuers. Under FIPS, an issuer's disclosure statements prepared under US law receive minimal review from Canadian regulators. This system has not yet been used, but it heralds the recognition in Canada of the global trading network in equity, debt, and other securities.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1995
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
When securities analysts are brought 'over the wall' to conduct due diligence in IPOs, their research reports risk improper disclosure of nonpublic information
Article Abstract:
Securities analysts' involvement in initial public offerings has been increasing, with investment bankers relying on their assessment of an issuer's business plan. When analysts have penetrated the Chinese wall during an initial public offering, restriction of what they are allowed to write must be imposed to avoid the impression that they are reporting on the basis of nonpublic information acquired during the due diligence transaction.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1996
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
- Abstracts: The amendment of Australia's domestic law after the Lamesa case: a lesson to be learned from Dutch case law. APAs in Australia, Canada and the United States: Current Developments and Future Directions
- Abstracts: State aid reform: Some reflections on the need to revise the notice on guarantees. Economic analysis and antitrust damages
- Abstracts: Bifurcation mitigates effect of damaging evidence; separate trials in products cases may curb the harmful effects of testimony on prior accidents and subsequent remedial measures
- Abstracts: When is an insurer bound by a duty to defend? Courts disagree over whether suits alleging infringement and misappropriation are covered
- Abstracts: Trade law and quality of life - dispute resolution under the NAFTA side accords on labor and the environment. The implications of expanding international dispute settlement systems: the 1982 Convention on the Law of the Sea