Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

Professional attitude; a U.S. District Court judge in Philadelphia says civility matters for lawyers (and that includes judges), both as professionals and as citizens

Article Abstract:

The lawyer, whether practicing lawyer, judge, law professor, or government official, who fails to observe civility undercuts belief in the law. A lawyer's treating an adversary derisively does damage to the fabric of the law. The same damage is done when a litigator reacts to an unfavorable ruling by charging the court with malignity. A judge aiming unjustified polemic at a lawyer may do even more serious harm to civility. Both need to remind themselves that they are engaged in a common task, to aim for the better working of the legal order.

Author: Pollak, Louis H.
Publisher: American Bar Association
Publication Name: ABA Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0747-0088
Year: 1998
Legal etiquette

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


When outsiders fill in; work arrangements with nonfirm lawyers can increase liability risks

Article Abstract:

Law firms using outside counsel face the problem in malpractice suits that courts use the "reasonable client's perception," whereby if the relationship between law firm and outside counsel would appear a partnership or association to an average client, then the court infers this relationship and vicarious liability attaches, making the hiring firm liable for the outside counsel's negligence. Steps a firm can take to state clearly the relationship between the two and limit liability exposure are listed.

Author: Hill, Anne W.
Publisher: American Bar Association
Publication Name: ABA Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0747-0088
Year: 1998
Management, Outside counsel

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA



Subjects list: Standards, United States, Legal ethics
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Squeeze play; as accountants edge into the legal market, lawyers may find themselves not only blindsided by the assault but also limited by professional rules
  • Abstracts: Supreme Court broadens actions available under ERISA s. 510 to include both welfare and pension plans. part 2 Seventh Circuit holds that "parties in interest" are not liable to plans for participatiing in prohibited transactions
  • Abstracts: Post-'Markman' cases vary claim construction; after 'Vitronics,' courts must follow a hierarchy that gives intrinsic evidence precedence
  • Abstracts: No sudden impact; courts rejecting mental disability claims despite EEOC guidelines intended to protect mentally ill. part 2
  • Abstracts: Entrenching the duopoly: why the Supreme Court should not allow the states to protect the Democrats and Republicans from political competition
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2026 Advameg, Inc.