Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

Selecting a jury in federal criminal trials after Batson and McCollum

Article Abstract:

Federal jury selection procedures should be modified to enhance the ability of district judges to prevent discriminatory use of peremptory challenges. Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 24(a) should be amended to allow parties the right to directly participate in voir dire examination of prospective jurors. This change would give judges more information for evaluating explanations of peremptory challenges. In addition, statistical decision theory should be used to analyze numeric evidence of discrimination. These steps should improve the application of Batson v. Kentucky and Georgia v. McCollum to jury selection in the district courts.

Author: DiPrima, Stephen R.
Publisher: Columbia Law Review
Publication Name: Columbia Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0010-1958
Year: 1995
United States, Cases, Federal courts, Practice, Peremptory challenges, Jury selection

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


The admissibility of ultimate issue expert testimony by law enforcement officers in criminal trials

Article Abstract:

The trend toward permissiveness in admitting ultimate issue expert testimony by law enforcement officers should be curtailed because of the special potential for prejudice and the low probative value of the testimony in most cases. Ultimate issue expert testimony by law enforcement officers should be admitted only when it is needed to help the jury understand the evidence, could not be provided in a less prejudicial manner and reaches conclusions supported by evidence rather than by speculation.

Author: Nossel, Deon J.
Publisher: Columbia Law Review
Publication Name: Columbia Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0010-1958
Year: 1993
Testimony, Police, Police officers, Evidence, Expert, Expert evidence

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Empowering ourselves: the role of women's NGOs in the enforcement of the Women's Convention

Article Abstract:

Women's non-governmental organizations (NGOs) can help enforce the 1979 Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women. Rampant discrimination and violence against women continue despite the Convention. Bangladesh offers a case study of how NGOs can augment enforcement of the Convention. NGOs can use their access to the citizenry to bring about pressure for more accountability and implementation. However, NGOs must be careful not to lose their independence.

Author: Afsharipour, Afra
Publisher: Columbia Law Review
Publication Name: Columbia Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0010-1958
Year: 1999
International, Bangladesh, Social aspects, Women, Non-governmental organizations, Nongovernmental organizations

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Laws, regulations and rules
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: New offence of employing illegal immigrants takes effect. Immigration and employment
  • Abstracts: Getting busy: corporate issues in the early stages of criminal environmental investigations. Allocating environmental liabilities in acquisitions
  • Abstracts: The formation of the family limited partnership: fraudulent transfer liability and other family problems. Future creditors and fraudulent transfers: when a claimant doesn't have a claim, when a transfer isn't a transfer, when fraud doesn't stay fradulent, and other important limits to fraudulent transfers law for the asset protection planner
  • Abstracts: Fragmented, incomplete, and discontinuous: the failure of federal privacy regulatory proposals and institutions
  • Abstracts: World needs an international criminal court. More sue their shrinks for sexual misconduct. Criminal defense lawyers boost bar groups
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.