State reactions to the trading of emissions allowances under Title IV of the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990
Article Abstract:
States have registered unanticipated objections to the trading of emissions allowances under Title IV of the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 through lawsuits and threatened passage of restrictive state laws. The program would be most endangered by proposed state laws that would institute state oversight of emissions trading between in-state and out-of-state utilities. The emissions trading program was designed to use free-market incentives to reduce sodium dioxide emissions, but the plan would be obstructed by such restrictive state legislation. A lawsuit filed by New York will probably not be successful.
Publication Name: Boston College Environmental Affairs Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0190-7034
Year: 1995
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
Cars, Congress, and clean air for the northeast: a separation of powers analysis of the Ozone Transport Commission
Article Abstract:
The US Congress established the Ozone Transport Commission (OTC) under the Northeast Ozone Transport Region in section 184 of the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990. Establishment of the OTC is not unconstitutional under the separation of powers or the nondelegation doctrine, the former taking place only if the OTC usurped the powers of the EPA or resulted in an undue concentration of legislative power. The OTC may ultimately result in an expansion of state power, not more congressional power. Moreover, it makes sense for Congress to give the development of ozone standards to experts.
Publication Name: Boston College Environmental Affairs Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0190-7034
Year: 1995
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
Groundwater jurisdiction under the Clean Water Act: the tributary groundwater dilemma
Article Abstract:
The approach of the United States Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit and the Sierra Club v. Colorado Refining Co. ruling giving the Clean Water Act (CWA)jurisdiction over groundwater as well as surface water deserves broader adoption. Interpreting the CWA this way would fulfil its legislative intent and is necessary to prevent the eventual contamination of surface waters.
Publication Name: Boston College Environmental Affairs Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0190-7034
Year: 1996
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
- Abstracts: Accurate calculation of short-swing profits under section 16(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The erosion of the law of controlling shareholders
- Abstracts: At the intersection of bankruptcy and divorce: property division debts under the Bankruptcy Reform Act of 1994
- Abstracts: Patent protection and technology transfer in the developing world: the Thailand experience. Eighteen months to publication: should the United States join Europe and Japan by promptly publishing patent applications?
- Abstracts: Proposed regulations provide guidance on modifications of debt instruments. Congress considers tax relief for debt restructurings
- Abstracts: Protecting the innocent: a key rule of insurance coverage takes a wild ride in the courts. The innocent-spouse rule; measure can protect client from unfair tax burden