The Holy See at United Nations conferences: state or church?
Article Abstract:
The Holy See's current status as Non-Member State Permanent Observer at the United Nations should be revoked because the Catholic Church does not meet international definitions of statehood. The Roman Catholic Church should be considered a non-governmental organization. The issue of its unique status has been raised at recent United Nations conferences. Continuing to allow the Holy See to participate in United Nations as a state would suggest that other religions that obtain dominion over a small area of land would also be able to insist on Non-Member State Permanent Observer status.
Publication Name: Columbia Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0010-1958
Year: 1996
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
Mission impossible: settling the just bounds between church and state
Article Abstract:
All liberal analyses of governments' responses to religious illiberal forces are failures because of the underlying contradiction in the original Lockean analysis. All liberal analysts of church and state tensions have begun their discussions without questioning the basic faulty reasoning instituted by John Locke in 1689. The Lockean tenet that all churches are orthodox to themselves and no earthly power can adjudicate their differences, can never accomodate government action against churches. The Hobbesian illiberal view can more realistically deal with illiberal forces.
Publication Name: Columbia Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0010-1958
Year: 1997
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
Law among liberal states: liberal internationalism and the act of state doctrine
Article Abstract:
A model based on liberal internationalism explains the paradoxical application of the act of state doctrine in Banco Nacional de Cuba v Sabbatino and subsequent decisions. According to the model, liberal states, those nations with representative governments, market economies and constitutional civil rights, act differently toward one another than toward nonliberal states. For example, courts are willing to judge the validity of laws of other liberal states, but issues concerning nonliberal states are treated as political questions outside the legal realm.
Publication Name: Columbia Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0010-1958
Year: 1992
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
- Abstracts: The U.S.-U.K. arbitration concerning Heathrow Airport user charges. Commercial arbitration - representation by foreign counsel - illegal practice of law in California
- Abstracts: The United Nations Compensation Commission - developments since October 1992. The International Whaling Commission and the North Atlantic Marine Mammal Commission: the institutional risks of coercion in consensual structures
- Abstracts: Hillsborough police are entitled to compensation for stress disorders. Government ignores cost-benefit analysis in outdoor activities scheme
- Abstracts: Transfer regulations preclude consensual variation of contract
- Abstracts: Audit guidelines and a correction program focus on section 403(b) plans. Final regulations simplify S corporation one-class-of-stock rule