Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

Title VII sexual harassment: recognizing an employer's non-delegable duty to prevent a hostile workplace

Article Abstract:

Non-delegable duties principles from agency law should be incorporated into Title VII hostile environment jurisprudence to ensure that employers cannot avoid liability for the actions of their agents, their employees, that create a hostile environment. By focusing on the duties of the employer and the employee, the employer has the incentive to ensure that the workplace is not a hostile environment under sexual harassment law. These principles will also serve to move the focus of Title VII claims away from examinations of the reasonableness of the plaintiffs' responses.

Author: Weddle, Justin S.
Publisher: Columbia Law Review
Publication Name: Columbia Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0010-1958
Year: 1995
Analysis, Employer liability, Agency (Law)

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


"Nothing personal:" individual liability under 42 U.S.C. 1983 for sexual harassment as an equal protection claim

Article Abstract:

Some courts' misinterpretation of constitutional torts under 42 USC 1983 has led to a limitation of sexual harassment remedies which should not have occurred. These courts' requirement of an additional element of "intent" in sexual harassment claims uses a long-rejected theory that plaintiffs can win only if they show defendant's sexual desire for them did not cause the actions. Individual liability under the Equal Protection Clause for sexual harassment by government agents is necessary for complete justice to victims of harassment.

Author: Anderson, Cheryl L.
Publisher: University of California Press
Publication Name: Berkeley Journal of Employment and Labor Law
Subject: Law
ISSN: 1067-7666
Year: 1998
Equality before the law, Equal protection, Constitutional torts

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


He said, he said: same-sex sexual harassment under Title VII and the "reasonable heterosexist" standard

Article Abstract:

Bias is often enacted against the defendant in a gay sexual harassment suit when the trier is a non-gay person with heterosexist values. Courts could alleviate this bias by refusing to recognize same-sex sexual harassment as a violation of Title VII. Judges could also be instructed to treat the defendant the same as if the trial's context were a mixed-sex interaction.

Author: Spitko, E. Gary
Publisher: University of California Press
Publication Name: Berkeley Journal of Employment and Labor Law
Subject: Law
ISSN: 1067-7666
Year: 1997
Gays, Cases, Sexism

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: United States, Laws, regulations and rules, Sexual harassment
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: The ethics of accommodating employees' religious needs in the workplace. part 2 Enforcement of subrogation provisions in employee benefit plans
  • Abstracts: Trash or treasure? Industrial recycling and international barriers to the movement of hazardous wastes. The procedural implementation process and a model substantive approach towards the storage, treatment, and disposal of hazardous waste in Western Europe
  • Abstracts: The demise of circumstantial proof in employment discrimination litigation: St. Mary's Honor Center v. Hicks, pretext, and the "personality" excuse
  • Abstracts: Actual contamination in the Federal Sentencing Guidelines: to prove or not to prove? The Federal Advisory Committee Act and its failure to work effectively in the environmental context
  • Abstracts: Fraud doctors: a revitalized False Claims Act is proving to be a new weapon for health-care employees who blow the whistle on ripoffs
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.