Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

Turning off the power on employees: using surreptitious tape-recordings and e-mail intrusions by employees in pursuit of employer rights

Article Abstract:

Employers need to recognize the threats posed by employees' surreptitious recordings and e-mail violations. The variety of legal remedies available includes defense against charges of employer wrongdoing, limiting damages via the after-acquired evidence rule, and seeking relief against employees. At the same time, employees have few rights regarding on-the-job surveillance by employers, especially regarding e-mail use. Cases involving recordings by both employees and employers are discussed.

Author: Kainen, Burton, Myers, Shel D.
Publisher: Commerce Clearing House, Inc.
Publication Name: Labor Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0023-6586
Year: 1997
Other Justice, Public Order, and Safety Activities, Privacy, Employers, Electronic mail systems, Email, Workers, Wiretapping

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


The Fourth Amendment and drug testing in the workplace: current U.S. court decisions

Article Abstract:

The constitutionality of drug testing in the workplace is being considered under a reasonableness interpretation rather than previous probable-cause analyses. Fourth Amendment rights to privacy are not necessarily invaded by drug testing if the interest of employers outweighs the interest of individuals. However, drug testing is not constitutional on the basis of past or off-duty drug-use or erratic behavior that may or may not be related to drug use.

Author: Liem, Stephen A.
Publisher: Commerce Clearing House, Inc.
Publication Name: Labor Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0023-6586
Year: 1992
Searches and seizures, Mandatory drug testing, Drug testing

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Privacy in the workplace: a practical primer

Article Abstract:

Employers concerned about possible liability for invasion of employee privacy should start with the principle that invasions of employee privacy can only be for clearly work-related purposes. Employees must also have notice of the purposes and circumstances in which their privacy might be invaded. Employers should have clear and specific policies on this matter.

Author: Bennett, Steven C., Locke, Scott D.
Publisher: Commerce Clearing House, Inc.
Publication Name: Labor Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0023-6586
Year: 1998
Employer liability

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: United States, Cases, Laws, regulations and rules, Privacy, Right of, Right of privacy, Electronic employee monitoring
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Courts around the country are addressing whether employers may be liable for the negligent hiring, supervision and retention of employees who harm others
  • Abstracts: Why recital 26 of the E.C. directive on the legal protection of biotechnological inventions should be implemented in national law
  • Abstracts: Putting the plaintiff and defendant on even ground: defining standards of settlement review and the statute of limitations in shareholder actions
  • Abstracts: Bargains without benefits: do the sentencing guidelines permit upward departures to redress the dismissal of charges pursuant to plea bargains?
  • Abstracts: Bringing justice to the Wild East; reconstruction in the former GDR. The new Europe: an economic giant is born
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.