When is an amendment not an amendment?: modification of arms control agreements without the Senate
Article Abstract:
Several recent arms control agreements contain provisions for informal modification procedures which are likely to cause conflict between Congress and the executive branch. Treaties have become more detailed, creating pressure for a more expedient amendment process. However, informal modification conflicts with constitutional checks and balances which assign the Senate the power to 'advise and consent' to treaties. A range of alternatives for dealing with treaty amendment includes reformatting arms control, use of nonbinding policy statements and use of a modified consultation process.
Publication Name: University of Chicago Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0041-9494
Year: 1992
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
Agreements within government entities and conspiracies under s. 1985(3) - a new exception to the intracorporate conspiracy doctrine?
Article Abstract:
Courts should not apply the intracorporate conspiracy doctrine to civil rights conspiracy actions brought under section 1985(3) of the Ku Klux Klan Act of 1871. The doctrine states that employees of one corporation cannot be found to have conspired because the corporation is a single entity under common law. Legislative history suggests that Congress did not intend for section 1985(3) to be limited by this doctrine, and antitrust case law supporting the doctrine should not be applicable. Conspiracies among government officials are the types of violations the Act sought to remedy.
Publication Name: University of Chicago Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0041-9494
Year: 1996
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
No way out: Eighth Amendment protection for do-or-die acts of the homeless
Article Abstract:
The Eighth Amendment protects the homeless from prosecution for crimes that are a consequence of their status, such as loitering, but cities have attempted to undercut this protection through prohibiting acts not status. However, acts that fall under the do-or-die category are also protected, since the person's status means that the action was the only alternative to death. Therefore, the Eighth Amendment can be used to protect the weak members of society without raising concerns that its protection could be expanded to cover drug use or other crimes.
Publication Name: University of Chicago Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0041-9494
Year: 1995
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
- Abstracts: Why time limits on the ratification of constitutional amendments violate Article V. An economic analysis of the guaranty contract
- Abstracts: The First Amendment and compulsory funding of student government political resolutions at state universities. Price fixing among elite colleges and universities
- Abstracts: The self-regulation of commodity exchanges: the case of market manipulation. An application of core theory to the analysis of ocean shipping markets
- Abstracts: Fund managers, foreign investment restrictions and questions of control. Foreign investment power and control of foreign investment in newspapers
- Abstracts: Reconsidering the taxation of life insurance proceeds through the lens of current estate planning. Taxation of business rent