Convictions overturned over quashed subpoenas
Article Abstract:
Two criminal convictions, in Texas and Florida, were overturned because reporters were not compelled to testify in violation of the defendants' Sixth Amendment rights to a fair trial. The Texas case involved a gang murder and the reporter's testimony was wanted to establish state of mind. The Florida case involved aggravated assault with a motor vehicle and the reporter could have given evidence supporting the defendant's contention that the accident was caused by the alleged victim. Both cases found that the fair trial right exceeded a reporter's privilege.
Publication Name: News Media & the Law
Subject: Literature/writing
ISSN: 0149-0737
Year: 1997
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
Survey indicates negotiation effective in fighting subpoenas
Article Abstract:
The ' Agents of Discovery: A Report on the Incidence of Subpoenas Served on the News Media in 1997' states that the average newspaper responding to a survey, conducted by the Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press, received 1.91 subpoenas, while the average broadcaster received 10.38 subpoenas. Television stations fully complied with the subpoenas 73 percent of the time, while newspapers complied at a rate of 23 percent. News organizations that challenged subpoenas in court were successful 75 percent of the time.
Publication Name: News Media & the Law
Subject: Literature/writing
ISSN: 0149-0737
Year: 1999
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
State high court overturned lawyer's admonishment for speaking to media
Article Abstract:
The North Dakota Supreme Court held that Assistant Attorney General JoAnn Toth did not violate the confidentiality clause of a sexual abuse settlement agreement when she answered questions from the media pertaining to open public records. The man accused of sexual abuse charged that Toth had agreed not to speak to the media but only provide documents requested. The court held that the implicit agreement was too broad to be legal, especially since the information Toth commented on was part of the public record.
Publication Name: News Media & the Law
Subject: Literature/writing
ISSN: 0149-0737
Year: 1997
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
- Abstracts: Let's go to the tape.... State high court rules trial court cannot close hearings to media based on 'speculation' on fair trial impact
- Abstracts: Actions taken against judges for talking to media contested. High court stays judge's gag order over report on Adidas sneaker plans
- Abstracts: Journalists, photographers face access roadblocks. Paparazzi bills advance in legislatures, but celebrity suits favor photographers
- Abstracts: Predestination and the heresy of merit in 'Othello.' The hybrid reformation of Shakespeare's second Henriad. Felt absences: the stage properties of 'Othello's' handkerchief
- Abstracts: An invaluable resource: the Fund for Investigative Journalism. Editorial writing & investigative journalism: reporting on the way to judgement