Court expands fair report privilege to private individuals
Article Abstract:
The Montana Supreme Court ruled in Lence v. Hagdone Investment Co that The Daily Inter Lake newspaper did not libel attorney John A. Lence with its report that a disciplinary complaint against him had been filed with the 'high court,' even though the filing was actually with the court's attorney review commission and no formal complaint was ever filed with the court. Lence had also contended that he was not a public official and the newspaper had no constitutional right to report on a private matter. The court ruled this irrelevant as long as the information was obtained lawfully.
Publication Name: News Media & the Law
Subject: Literature/writing
ISSN: 0149-0737
Year: 1993
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
Appeals panel protects summary of statement
Article Abstract:
The US Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit has held that California's fair and true report privilege is applicable to out-of-court statements and that a judge may determine that applicability rather than a jury. Singer Engelbert Humperdinck had sued the National Enquirer over a report that he is HIV-infected, but the court found the article fair under the privilege.
Publication Name: News Media & the Law
Subject: Literature/writing
ISSN: 0149-0737
Year: 1992
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
State high court allows use of 'wire service' defense in libel suits
Article Abstract:
The Michigan Supreme Court ruled in Howe v. Detroit Free Press Inc that the wire service defense could be used in libel cases. The case involved the father of major league baseball pitcher Steve Howe, who sued for libel over a news story. The court agreed with Detroit Free Press, that the news service was not required to verify articles picked up from news wires.
Publication Name: News Media & the Law
Subject: Literature/writing
ISSN: 0149-0737
Year: 1998
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
- Abstracts: Editorial on transportation company ruled 'opinion': court also upholds tough standard for proving 'defamation by implication'
- Abstracts: Courts reexamine access to jury information: Missouri, Ohio high courts affirm presumptive right of access. District attorney petitions appeals court to vacate judge's order permitting 'Frontline' to tape jury
- Abstracts: Court tells police to release reports or show harm. Civilian complaints of police misconduct must be released
- Abstracts: Court allows suit based on vague identification. Court upholds dismissal of civil rights suit. Court upholds dismissal of Business Week suit