Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Literature/writing

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Literature/writing

Court strikes down sealed case indexes

Article Abstract:

The US District Court in Massachusetts ruled in Globe Newspaper Co v. Fenton that a state law sealing case indices of criminal trials was a First Amendment restraint of the public's right of access to court records. The statute on former defendants' privacy rights was held to be overbroad, since it pertained to all cases, not just those where the defendant had a special interest in privacy protections. The court stated public access outweighed former criminal defendants' right to privacy.

Publisher: Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press
Publication Name: News Media & the Law
Subject: Literature/writing
ISSN: 0149-0737
Year: 1993
Cases, Privacy, Right of, Right of privacy

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Court opens some records of doctor review panels

Article Abstract:

The US Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit has ruled that a Maryland law sealing the records of medical peer review committees is not applicable in cases where the committee is sued and the records become discoverable under the law's confidentiality exception. The court stated that maintaining the confidentiality of the review committee was not enough of a compelling government interest to violate the constitutional rights of the press.

Publisher: Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press
Publication Name: News Media & the Law
Subject: Literature/writing
ISSN: 0149-0737
Year: 1992
Records and correspondence, Professional standards review organizations (Medicine)

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Court strikes down secrecy law

Article Abstract:

The Montana Supreme Court declared unconstitutional the state law prohibiting access to criminal affidavits, stating that the law violates the public's right of access to all public records unless there is an individual's right to privacy that outweighs the public's right to know. The law was challenged by direct appeal to the Supreme Court by 25 news organizations prior to the law coming into effect.

Publisher: Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press
Publication Name: News Media & the Law
Subject: Literature/writing
ISSN: 0149-0737
Year: 1992
Laws, regulations and rules, Affidavits

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Access control, Court records
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Court allows suit based on vague identification. Court upholds dismissal of civil rights suit. Court upholds dismissal of Business Week suit
  • Abstracts: Consumers: stories on credit errors focus on how they occu. Gore and OXY. Uncovering war atrocities: veterans Hersh, Schanberg: stories have always been tough sells
  • Abstracts: Following the faithful: Faith Healer: Hidden cameras help, hidden records frustrate probe into televangelist. Bad apples: charter schools hire felons, mismanage taxpayer money
  • Abstracts: Damages for broken promise upheld. State's 'due process' right doesn't trump shield law. Naming source not waiver of privilege
  • Abstracts: Judge refuses to restrain Penthouse from publishing Jones photos. Publishing secret police file not an invasion of privacy
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.