Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

News, opinion and commentary

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » News, opinion and commentary

Should English be the official language of the United States?

Article Abstract:

Supporters of official English believe bilingual programs increase the time before non-English speakers can become first-class citizens while funding non-English services and publications is unnecessary. Opponents feel that English is currently the unofficial language and so making it official would not effect any significant changes but would emphasize to bilingual Americans that they are not as accepted as English only-speakers. Supporters think it would give the US a common link between cultures while opponents think it will further discrimination and resentment of non-English speakers.

Author: Mujica, Mauro E., Underwood, Robert A.
Publisher: Congressional Quarterly, Inc.
Publication Name: CQ Researcher
Subject: News, opinion and commentary
ISSN: 1056-2036
Year: 1996

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Debate over bilingualism: should English be the nation's official language?

Article Abstract:

Support for language minorities has been dropping since the early 1980s and the controversy between those for bilingual education and those wanting English as the official language is growing. Official English supporters believe bilingualism is just dividing the US into conflicting minorities while those opposing it believe the movement is sparked by nativism and concern about increasing immigration especially from Spanish-speaking countries. Congress is under pressure to cut bilingual education funding because of effectivity questions largely by official English supporters.

Author: Donegan, Craig
Publisher: Congressional Quarterly, Inc.
Publication Name: CQ Researcher
Subject: News, opinion and commentary
ISSN: 1056-2036
Year: 1996

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Preventing juvenile crime: Is tougher punishment or prevention the answer?

Article Abstract:

Two basic approaches to reducing juvenile crime are prevention and punishment. Proponents of the preventive approach advocate social programs that serve at-risk populations, including in-school programs that target drug prevention and develop conflict resolution skills. Proponents of the punishment approach believe that juveniles should receive tougher and longer punishments. They expect the number of criminals to increase and that these offenders will be more violent.

Author: Donegan, Craig
Publisher: Congressional Quarterly, Inc.
Publication Name: CQ Researcher
Subject: News, opinion and commentary
ISSN: 1056-2036
Year: 1996
Laws, regulations and rules, Prevention, Demographic aspects, Violent crimes, Punishment, Juvenile delinquency, Crime prevention, Curfew

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Social aspects, Minorities, Language policy, English-only movement
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Going for the gold. Changing the face of the farm
  • Abstracts: Show him the money: a U.S. fund manager puts the squeeze on Eaton's. Fear in the hallways
  • Abstracts: Chopper trouble: lobbying is clouding the choice of new rescue helicopters. He's No Churchill
  • Abstracts: Goodbye, spy-in-the-sky. Thin edge of the wedge. Out of the valley of death
  • Abstracts: Is community policing the best answer to the nation's crime problem? Have the benefits of community policing been oversold?
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.